Democrat Senator Zell Miller to Endorse President Bush

The Democrats should all endorse Bush. He's carrying out the Democrat agenda far better than Clinton ever did.

 

One of the reasons I'll be voting for him, whereas I did not in 2000.

 

What is the joke I heard, Democrats have became Socialists and Republicans have become Democrats. To be honest after watching the CNN ROCK THE VOTE debate last night, I do not think any of the Democratic candidates have a chance against Bush in 2004. They are like cartoon characters who appeal to the fringe Left in the USA. Too me the only fellow who actually has a message is Howard Dean (And he has the wrong message!). The questons asked by those college students had to be the most unintelligent questions ever asked such as,

"What would you do if you were manager of the Boston Red Sox"

"Have you ever smoked pot"?

"Who would you most like to party with?"

Goodness! Are these really the future leaders of the US?! They would have done better having the debate at a kindergarden school where they might get some intelligent questions. Bush has his problems but the Democratic party has greater problems. They have candidates that have more in common with Lenin than George Washington.

 

Zell Miller isn't a socialist.

None of the Democrats are interesting.
None. The Democrats have been captured
by the Left and the Left has run out of
ideas. I think Dean will be the candidate.

Bush has a steely strength. He's a lot
smarter than the Democrats thought. He
has shown great leadership.

Unfortunately the media are covering the
war from their perspective which is biased
to the Left. I wonder how we would have
done in WWII if the news had covered it
the same way they cover Iraq. Imagine
the Battle of the Bulge covered by the
press today. They would have probably
suggested that we surrender.

I'm an independent. I voted for McCain
in the primary in 2000. But I'm glad
Bush has been on duty. He knows that right
now there is more important business to
be done than even being President. He's
sticking to his convictions.

Clay

 

And people say that second party candidates don't matter! Remember, Ralph Nader, the Green Party presidential candidate in 2000, took enough votes away from Al Gore to cost him the presidency. So now the Democrat side of the Demopublican Party is moving toward the issues and concerns of Green Party members to attempt to garner their votes in 2004. And this is the result of Mr. Nader only getting about 2.7% of the vote.

The same thing would happen if, say, the Constitution Party presidential candidate received about 3% of the vote and cost someone like George W. Bush victory in a close election. The next election cycle the Republican side of the Demopublican Party would move toward the issues and concerns of those of us who want to re-establish limited, constitutional government. And the Republicans would be moving toward more freedom for all Americans instead of moving toward the socialism that the Democrats are moving even further toward now.

 

Yep. But most Christians would rather have Bush to run the country leftward faster than any Democrat in history. Why? Because he's a Republican.

How sad.

 

True. Bush is so left, that he signed the Partial Birth Abortion ban yesterday. What a liberal.

Get real, people.

 

Kiffin,
The best line in the debate IMHO was when John Edwards rebuked Howard Dean, saying that the last thing Southerners want is a man like him coming down and telling us how to live our lives.

 

Don't you wish Zell Miller was only 52 instead of 72?

What a Man!

 

I do, Bro. Jim! I had a concern / question and wrote his office over a year ago. They have repeatedly addressed my concerns and I got a final letter from HIM a few days ago apologizing that his office had only been able to help with information and that it had taken a year to finalize the answer. (Our son had been hired by TSA and his paperwork was 'lost' and not found until the positions at Hartsfield were filled.)

Zell Miller is a FINE man!

Diane

 

Miller is a "real" Democrat. Similar to
Henry Jackson and Sam Nunn. The others
are...

Clay

 

The word you are searching for, Clay, is

BOLSHEVIK

 

It was good of him to sign the PBA ban. But there are still 3500+ babies per day being murdered and I see no plan to do anything. Nor do I hear any outcry on their behalf.

Otherwise, can you list 5 major, significant policy reversals from the Clinton administration?

 

I didn't think so.

 

1. Monica don't work there no more.
2. Our military is honored.
3. There is a real marriage and a real family in the White House now.
4. The President is not under suspicion for a string of shady deals and perjuries in the past.
5. Everybody got a tax cut.

 

In order:

1) A bit of humor keeps us sane. But of course this does not count as a major policy rversal.

2) Our military was honored under Clinton, although perhaps not so much by him. But there is no policy reversal of substance here either. In fact, Bush has kept the Clinton policies on women in combat and homosexuals.

3) No policy reversal there.

4) True, but no policy reversal.

5) Tax cut was good. How it works with massive out-of-control spending is a mystery to me. I'd characterize it as tinkering with the tax code rather than any significant reversal. But, I don't wish to argue that point so I'll say that it is a reversal.

SO...with a stretch we have ONE. Out of, say, 10 major issues that could be dealt with, I'd say that statistically Bush is about the same as Clinton on actual policy implemented.

p.s. Thanks for the answer. Mr. Vols should give you a cupcake or an apple from his lunch for doing his work for him.

 

Considering the way that the Bush adminstration is mistreating our veterans, Mr. Bush has not been an improvement and maybe even worse in this area.