Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by church mouse guy, Jun 20, 2015.
And it probably won't be Bo Derek.
Those Kremlin trolls at work again...
This is really unnecessary.
That is awesome, and about time the other half of the population gets a chance at this!
I'm going to be ticked if it's Jenner though.
Does anyone see a "Boycott the ten dollar bill!" coming? I think there will be some such thing, but it won't make enough difference. The Cherokees and other "natives" (especially in Oklahoma) have been boycotting the 20 for decades because of Andrew Jackson's pic. How many people even know? But for the record, their casinos do accept them.
Yes , it is.
But Hillary should be pushing for her idol, Margaret Sanger.
Bottom line is it doesn't matter who it is, but democrats are liable to push for someone that hates America as much as they do.
I am not saying it is un necessary for a woman on a bill. I am saying the Jenner thing is unnecessary.
I'm rooting for Harriet Tubman.
This is a great thing.
I never noticed that ws Bruce, I mean Caitlyn. Thanks for clearing that up.
You have to admit, if they put him/her on the bill, it will satisfy both sexes? :smilewinkgrin: Just sayin'!
How about Harriet Tubman or Sojourner Truth?
I don't think we need to put a woman on our money who promoted radical feminism by showing her breasts to the public.
Who.....Pamela Anderson?!? I'm all for it:laugh: