Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by Salty, Dec 10, 2007.
Yes and at the CIA, who are probably the ones that destroyed those tapes.
Need some more mud to sling? Got any evidence, or just more idle gossip.
Yes and they seem to put politics far ahead of national interest. These Clintonistas are bad for America.
You sling yer share of mud around here, MP. Don't be silly.
Not at all. For Tentmaker to say Hillary caused the CIA to destroy tapes without one shred of evidence is indeed idle gossip.
I don't think it's a stretch at all, remember Sandy Burglar ? Remember Whitewater ? The Clintons have a history of destroying evidence.
I think it's fair speculation.
Aren't you the guy who called Limbaugh "Pig-Boy" ? Without one shred of evidence he has any pigs in his lineage ?
Or is your skin a little thin, in this cold weather ?
Call it slander or call it gossip, it remains malicious libel and character assassination without a bit of supporting evidence. If you have evidenvce, lets see it, otherwise you are just carrying false tales. Who is the father of lies?
Come on guys, cant you take a joke.
I very easily could have subsitued George for Hillary:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Um, the guy who calls Limbaugh a pig ? Or the guy who did not have sex with that woman ? I give up, MP.
It's none of those things, its knowing the history of the Clintons, and speculating their future actions.
I still say you just have thin skin when it comes to your heros.
Admittedly, I have been needlessly hard on both Mr. Limbaugh and Mrs. Clinton in the past and I'd like to take this time to apologize to "fans" of both. :godisgood:
They both leave themselves open to much criticism. They both deserve a lot of criticism.
Bro. Curtis, now you're tempting me to agree with you and start bashing both of them again but that require me to once more hijack this thread and apologize.
Amen to that!!!!!
The Clintons are not my heroes, but they don't deserve to be falsely accused. As for Limbaugh, you must admit he has rather a porcine profile, as well as behaving badly. But you are right. I must apologize to the pigs for making that comparison.
Note: I have not falsely accused Limbaugh of something without evidence, so you are comparing apples and peanuts.
You should read, "The Year of the Rat" by co-authors, Edward Timperlake and William C. Triplett II. It is a painstakingly documented book concerning the Clinton's lives, though concentrating on Bill's compromising U. S. Security for Chinese cash. There's virtually no integrity in the Clinton's.