Differances in KJV "Editions"

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by DeclareHim, Aug 19, 2004.

  1. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    "and he went into the citie" Ruth 3:15 1611 KJV AV

    "and she went into the the city" Ruth 3:15 KJV 1769

    "in the temple" 2 Kings 11:10 1611 KJV AV

    "in the temple of the LORD" 2 Kings 11:10 KJV 1769

    "God" Isaiah 14:13 1611 KJV AV

    "the LORD" Isaiah 14:13 1769 KJV

    There's your differances. Which is correct and don't show your ingnorance by saying both. They are DIFFERANT so both can't be right. Can they. Come and get it KJVO. :cool:
     
  2. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok KJVO you have failed to show up! I'm sorry if I finally beat your argument but hey I gotta expose lies. Especially lies that hinder people from serving God.

    1cross+3nails=4given
     
  3. Slambo

    Slambo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well now,your modern Bible isn't the same as my KJV,they are both different and therefore cannot be right...So tell me,which is correct?????
     
  4. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Baptist Doctrine of the Priesthood
    of the Believer says you, Brother Slambo,
    are responsible before God for figuring
    that out for yourself.

    The first clue i'll share with you is
    that if two Bibles are different, that does
    not mean they are not both "right".

    [​IMG]
     
  5. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slambo said "Well now,your modern Bible isn't the same as my KJV,they are both different and therefore cannot be right...So tell me,which is correct????"

    Excellent simultaneously avoid and reinforce the point of the original post.

    Ed said "The first clue i'll share with you is
    that if two Bibles are different, that does
    not mean they are not both "right"."

    Preach it brother Ed! [​IMG]
     
  6. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,118
    Likes Received:
    319
    I've been trying to find out something similar Slambo.

    There are hundreds of differences between the AV1611 and the AV1769, in your own words "they are both different and therefore cannot be right...So tell me,which is correct?????".

    In fact there were TWO First Editions of the 1611 KJV. One out of Cambridge and one from Oxford, both of these First Editions are different (howbeit not many places but different nonetheless). The differences between these two persist until today, I prefer the Oxford 1769,
    how about yourself?

    HankD
     
  7. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well now,your modern Bible isn't the same as my KJV,they are both different and therefore cannot be right...So tell me,which is correct????? </font>[/QUOTE]Good dodge [​IMG] but answer my question which of your KJV's is correct the 1611 or 1769 tell me whcih of those is right and I'll tell you my answer.
     
  8. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why not just say both are God's Word and then you can join our side and believe that many Bible's are God's Words.

    1cross+3nails=4given
     

Share This Page

Loading...