1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do Anti-War Protests Really Embolden Our Enemies?

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by poncho, Mar 19, 2007.

  1. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    UM....that should be Randy Weaver, & David Koresh, not Terry Nichols. My mistake.
     
  2. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I don't know that Weaver was part of a seperatist movement. I don't have any idea whether it helped any movement or not I don't keep up on such things. Koresh? All I know about that is the government can get away with killing citizens on American soil with out to much fuss.

    I do know that back awhile ago there was mention in the news about the Pentagon's Proactive Preemptive Operations Group.

    The proposed organization(s) would incorporate and expand existing military covert capabilities for the preparation, training and execution of anti-terrorist operations with the NSC doing the planning. The Army's highly compartmentalized Intelligence Support Activity, established in 1981 and now known as Gray Fox, anti-terror and intelligence collection capabilities would be included in the postulated hierarchy. One recommendation calls for the creation of a "Proactive Preemptive Operating Group" (P2OG) that would oversee missions involving special forces, psychological warfare experts and other covert operations. One aim would be to "improve information collection by stimulating reactions" among intelligence targets. The intent of the new organizations would be to hold "states/sub-state actors accountable" and "signal to harboring states that their sovereignty will be at risk" according to the panel's briefing paper. SOURCE

    I guess the whole idea is to keep poking sharp sticks in "
    intelligence targets" eyes until they react by carrying out terrorist attacks. Not very good for the victims that get caught in the middle I reckon. One might think that the Pentagon itself is recruiting for 'Al Qeada' doing this kind of thing.


     
  3. Tom Bryant

    Tom Bryant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,521
    Likes Received:
    43
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Poncho,
    Of course propaganda is used in all wars, but in Vietnam and in this one, it is not made up propaganda or propaganda by collaborators or quislings, it is propaganda provided by our own country men.

    It is used used by politicians, but the republicans are not shooting at the democrats.

    Of course we are fightiung a war against an idealogy. Since when haven't we? Facism was an idealogy. The Japanese were an idealogy in WW2. That's why they were kamakazi attacks.

    Yes, this is opinion only. But until you've been in battlefield situation and heard your own country men and women call you murderers, rapists and the real terrorists, you have nothing but your own un-informed opinion. Read the memoirs of Vietnamese generals such as Commander Giap. They will tell you the effect that anti war protests had to embolden the enemy.
     
  4. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0

    I think that about says it all. I would add the following article:


    http://www.vwam.com/vets/tet/tet.html


    * Note this site contains some graphic pics of the slain people of the war.
     
  5. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I agree, some examples of the propaganda used by our own countrymen.

    Islamofascism. The word itself is pure propaganda playing on fear.

    Mushroom clouds. Another appeal to fear.

    Saddam is a danger to our national security. He had no wmd's, he didn't have the military or economic means to attack us here. He wasn't tied to Al Qaeda.

    Saddam tried to buy uranium, the "yellow cake" lie. Everyone knew the documents were forgeries but they used them anyway to appeal to fear.

    The aluminum tubes and the British supplied helium trucks, again propaganda used to appeal to fear.

    Then there are the talking heads like O' Reilly and Limbaugh that shout down critisize demonize or ignore anyone with with a different opinion. And call it fair and balanced. People like O'Reilly can't even get basic facts correct. That's why they rely so heavily on propaganda to get everyone to thinking if you disagree with the warparties you are a liberal or afflicted with some other mental disorder.

    If anyone is guilty of using propaganda that has hurt or country, national security and emboldened Islamic terrorism it is those that have taken over our government, military and media and use it to enrich themselves.

    And it is also used to shape public opinion and whip up support for elective wars and invasions and keep anyone with opposing views feeling demorilized and powerless.

    Yeah we listened to them all shill for the warparties before the invasion of Iraq got scared and angry and gave or children and treasures to the MIC, oil barons and AIPAC to use as they please. Now the same people (after the truth has been steadily leaking out about them) are acting as thought police to try to bully people back into the mezmerized state they like to keep us in. But it isn't working anymore. We've found out what tools the propagandists like them use and we're seeing right through it. Well, most of are unless you listen to the O' Reilly's that try to make everyone think dissenters are just small groups of disgruntled leftists and conspiracy wackos. Along with their other childish primetime tantrums and Foxed facts.

    Total theatrics! Neither party is opposed to war and both are subservient to business and foreign influences over our policies whether they be domestic or foreign. The republicans and democrats don't make policy, they follow the prepacked policies of whoever can 'influence' them enough. All their debates and postering mean nothing because they control nothing.

    That's the story most often dutifully repeated anyways, a real honest and close look at all the documents, memos and propaganda reveals otherwise. Fascism? What is fascism? Business and government combined, we have the military contractors and transnational business interests running this country through the government. If that isn't fascism I don't know what is and neither do you. The Japanese were imperialists we "beat them" only to become like them? The whole idea of the GWOT is based on imperialism. Read what the neocons, and their partners at AIPAC the CFR and Trilateral Commisions were writting long before G. W. ever got to the WH.

    Times have changed brother. People no longer blame our fighting men and women for the crimes of their 'superiors' at least not reasonable people which most are, The majority of people that protest this war have legitimate concerns. People like Sheehan and Fonda are put forward on center stage by the media for no other reason than to demonize and marginalize any legitimate movements. Cointellpro style.

    Seems to me the un-informed opinions come from the warparties shills like O'Reilly and Hannity that can't even keep basic facts straight. You know what probably emboldens the 'enemy' more than anything else? Invading and ocuppyiny their lands on trumped up bogus charges that turn out to be total fiction when looked at afterwords in the proper context.

    I would if I could find them. Latter on I may post a whole page of documents for you to read.

    And while I'm at it I may as well get this out now before I am accused of such, I am not now nor have I ever been a liberal, a leftist, a commie, a socialist, an anti-semite, a speratist, a nazi, an anti-war advocate, a fascist, an imperialist, a globalist, or a democrat and I regret ever being a follower of the neo-conned republicrats.

    I am a Christian and an American that see's clearly that our religion is being perverted and used against us by scoundrels on both sides of the aisle and our country being systematically dismantled and looted by a global crime syndicate that cares nothing for human life, liberty or our Constitutional Republic that was set up by our founders in the hopes of protecting us from just such a thing.
     
    #25 poncho, Mar 23, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 23, 2007
  6. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    And I'm not a pacifist either.
     
  7. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Here is what a Democrat Senator said:
    http://soliver.typepad.com/noneutrality/current_affairs/index.html

    below is a part of the Dems speech from the link above:


    ..."Past Congresses certainly debated wars. They argued heatedly about them. And they clashed directly with the Executive Branch over their execution. But in doing so they accepted the consequences of their convictions.
    This resolution does no such thing. It is simply an expression of opinion. It does not pretend to have any substantive effect on policy on the ground in Iraq.
    But again, I ask you: what will this resolution say to our soldiers? What will it say to our allies? And what will it say to our enemies?
    We heard from General Petraeus during his confirmation hearing that war is a battle of wills. Our enemies believe that they are winning in Iraq today. They believe that they can outlast us; that, sooner or later, we will tire of this grinding conflict and go home. That is the lesson that Osama bin Laden took from our retreats from Lebanon and Somalia in the 1980s and 1990s. It is a belief at the core of the insurgency in Iraq, and at the core of radical Islam worldwide. And this resolution—by codifying our disunity, by disavowing the mission our troops are about to undertake—confirms our enemies’ belief in American weakness. This resolution also sends a terrible message to our allies. I agree that we must hold the Iraqi government to account. That is exactly what the resolution Senator McCain and I have offered would do. But I ask you: Imagine for a moment that you are a Sunni or Shia politician in Baghdad who wants the violence to end—and ask yourself how the Warner-Levin resolution will affect your thinking, your calculations of risk, your willingness to stand against the forces of extremism. Every day, you are threatened by enemies who want nothing but to inflict the most brutal imaginable horrors on you and your loved ones. Will this resolution empower you, or will it undermine you? Will it make you feel safer, or will it make you feel you should hedge your bets, or go over to the extremists, or leave the country? "...
     
  8. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
  9. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    You left out Paleolibertarian. BINGO!
     
  10. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Is this the best you can do? How disappointing.
     
  11. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Just pointing out the obvious, for those who may have missed it.
     
  12. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
  13. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Why is that?
     
Loading...