Do you have to have. . . .

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by SaggyWoman, Sep 22, 2004.

  1. SaggyWoman

    SaggyWoman
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    8
    Do you have to have Baptist in your name to be a Baptist?
     
  2. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,630
    Likes Received:
    310
    Nope, it's a matter of holding to the distinctives. Let's face it there are plenty of churchs with Baptist over the front door that ain't anymore.
     
  3. mesly

    mesly
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Squire, I agree with you. But, this was hashed out a bit a few months ago in another thread regarding who could be a member of the Baptist Board. It appears that you just might have to have the word "Baptist" in your name, and not just hold to baptistic doctrine.

    http://www.baptistboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/48/645/2.html?
     
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    I was involved in Grace Fundamental Church in the Dallas area. That was the sign, the info people got.

    But it was NOT just "baptistic". In the constitution of the church it started, "Grace Fundamental Church, a Baptist church, . . . "

    Spelling it out like that is what makes positive identification of a church as a "baptist" church even though "baptist" may not be in the name.

    Like my son's church, Saddleback Church, is SBC and signs full agreement with the BFM Baptist statement of faith. But you would not know it from the surface literature.
     
  5. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,630
    Likes Received:
    310
    I agree with Dr. Bob. It is a matter of truth in advertiseing for me. There are many good and sufficent reasons for a church not to have Baptist in their name but still be a "Baptist" church. However, there are many bad and insufficent reasons for leaving it off.
     
  6. Circuitrider

    Circuitrider
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/circuitrider2.JPG>

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2000
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    0
    Recently I visited a church were several new converts were asking why this church was "Baptist" in name and why it had to be. :confused:

    A practical answer is that we have to call it something. ;) One person suggested "Christian" since that is a title the Antioch church identified with. Of course "Christian" as a name has all kinds of baggage with it...primarily baptism as a part of salvation. At the same time I understand that "Baptist" also has baggage, namely the Baptist distinctives and primarily believers baptism. [​IMG]

    IMHO while a church might call itself "Baptist" and yet not be baptist in practice, it seems to me that if you are "Baptist" and believe those key distinctives, there seems little logical or practical reason to avoid using the name. :cool:
     
  7. Bro.Bill

    Bro.Bill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope,but they are easier to find with the sign on the lawn.
     

Share This Page

Loading...