Do you practice Alexandrianism?

There is a scare tactic used by some members of
a party i'll not name. They say that ALL Modern Versions (MVs)
are translated from evil Alexandrian manuscripts.

BTW, I define 'MV' to mean any version created
since 1699. The KJV1769 Translation/version/edition
was created after 1700 so meets my definition of
being an MV. Which means that the KJV many (from 2% to 60%)
KJVOs use, the KJV1769 Edition, is also translated from
Alexandrian manuscripts.

But anyway, most who concern them with the errors
of the Alexandianists don't define the MV like I do.
Tell the truth now, are you a dreded practionier
of the evil Alexandrianism?

Your answer will be recored for all to see.

 

In General, being an Alexandrianist is a demonization of
certain LIBERAL CHRISTIANS who believe they can
get saved by Bibles other than the KING JAMES BIBLE (KJB).
(well the KJB is called the KJV /King James Version/ by nearly
everybody including the translators of the LKV,
the publishers of the KJV and most users of the KJV)

The existance of Alexandrianism is a myth created by
certain people who have no scriptureal basis for their
doctrine of one-and-only-one-Bible-ism

 

Recall that Alexandria was the home of the Greek Translations
of the Old Testament (Law & Prophets) called the
LXX or Septuagint. An edition of the LXX (Roman numerals for '70') was
probably the Bible Version read by Jesus. There were multiple editions
of the LXX written from about 200BC.

 

In the Wikipedia article about the LXX it is said:

So Origen of Alexandria, Egypt, did have something to do with our
current Bibles - not much, but something

 

Tee Hee.

If 'origin' is the present tense wouldn't the past tense
be 'origined' instead of your word 'origened'?

Note for the peanut gallery:
This conversation is no more 'out of whack' than the
voting

Next i'm sure we will work on 'ArmInian' and 'ArmEnian'.

 

Tee Hee, I guess I hit a raw nerve??

Like I told my wife:
I use more KJVs than he do! :saint:

2 Timothy 3:16 (KJV1611 Edition):
All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God, & is profitable
for doctrine, for reproofe, for correction,
for instrution in righteousnesse,

I believe by faith in Jesus the Christ that
All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God.

I also believe that 'God' includes God the Father,
God the Son (AKA: Messiah Jesus), and God
the Holy Spirit.

I also believe that ALL SCRIPTURE includes
the Bibles listed at the top of a nearby poll/page:

Geneva Bible of 1587
KJV1611 Edition
KJV1769 Edition
KJV1873 Edition
NASB = New American Standard Bible
NIV = New International Version
ESV = English Standard Version

and on this page:

http://www.tyndale.cam.ac.uk/scriptures/

and on this page:

http://www.tyndale.cam.ac.uk/scriptures/more.htm

 

Tee Hee!

I got kicked off one board for quoting:

Romans 10:9 (KJV1611 Edition):
That if thou shalt confesse with thy mouth
the Lord Iesus, and shalt beleeue in thine heart,
that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saued.

Which when you pronounce it in 1611 English
sounds a whole lot like the KJV used by many people:

Romans 10:9 (KJV1769 Edition):

[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth
the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart
that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.


[/FONT]