1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Does the NKJV Follow the TR Texts?

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Dr. Bob, Aug 25, 2004.

Top Posters
Page 7 of 7
  1. michelle

    michelle New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    --------------------------------------------------
    But don't forget the DOUBLE STANDARDS.
    The double standards are documented at:
    http://www.baptistboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/4/1411.html?
    Go check them out.
    --------------------------------------------------


    Hey Ed, are you also keeping track of the double standards of the anti-KJB? Here is just one of many for ya:


    --------------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------
    Wow, only $10 for a tract containing Waite's spew on the NKJV? What a bargain! Or something.
    --------------------------------------------------

    And how much does it cost you to by all the different versions you use? How much money does it cost you to read all the pro mv/anti-KJB material?
    --------------------------------------------------


    love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
    michelle
     
    #121 michelle, Aug 27, 2004
  2. natters

    natters New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    How is that a double standard? Please explain it to me.
     
    #122 natters, Aug 27, 2004
  3. michelle

    michelle New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    --------------------------------------------------

    No it's not.

    Just like oxens is not correct (which the KJV men got right in this case).

    KJV Numbers 7:77
    And for a sacrifice of peace offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year: this [was] the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran.

    HankD
    --------------------------------------------------

    Now you are actually showing forth what I have been saying all along. What you consider are errors, are not errors. These are NOT THE SAME THING as what is EVIDENCED is ALTERED in the mv's.

    Like I have said, you are comparing light as being the same as darkness and trying to make it APPEAR the same, when it is not.


    love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
    michelle
     
    #123 michelle, Aug 27, 2004
  4. michelle

    michelle New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    --------------------------------------------------
    How is that a double standard? Please explain it to me.
    --------------------------------------------------


    Many of you are experts at finding the double standards (of course very biasly, and false) and you are the one who made it. You figure it out. What, you cannot see your own double standard?


    love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
    michelle
     
    #124 michelle, Aug 27, 2004
  5. natters

    natters New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    michelle said "What, you cannot see your own double standard?"

    No, I cannot. I'm asking you nicely and sincerely to please explain it to me.
     
    #125 natters, Aug 27, 2004
  6. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am not sure that Michelle understands what a double standard is.
     
    #126 Scott J, Aug 27, 2004
  7. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That's right The KV translators got the plural of ox (oxen) correct but the plural of cherub and seraph wrong. The plural of cherub is cherubs or cherubim not cherubims, the plural of seraph is seraphim not seraphims.

    HankD
     
    #127 HankD, Aug 27, 2004
  8. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Scott J said:

    I am not sure that Michelle understands what a double standard is.

    I am not sure that sentence isn't about five words too long.
     
    #128 Ransom, Aug 27, 2004
  9. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And on that note, think we have reached the consensus that the statement "Does the NKJV Follow the TR Text" is 100% accurate.

    Any attack on the NKJV should not be based on underlying Greek documentation.
     
    #129 Dr. Bob, Aug 27, 2004
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 7 of 7
Loading...