Does this verse prove election?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by xdisciplex, Mar 26, 2007.

  1. xdisciplex

    xdisciplex
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,766
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pro 16:4 The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.

    :confused:


     
  2. bmerr

    bmerr
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    0
    Eli,

    bmerr here. No.

    In Christ,

    bmerr
     
  3. Bro. James Reed

    Bro. James Reed
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,992
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't use that verse alone to prove election, but that is an example of election.
     
  4. Dustin

    Dustin
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    696
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto.

    Soli Deo Gloria,
    Dustin
     
  5. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have studied the arguments for "election" (in the usual way this term is used) and I do not think the Scriptures support it.

    I therefore believe this text speaks about "the wicked" as a general class, not as specific individuals....
     
  6. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    There have to be individuals in the class, and they are called wicked. Unless of course, an individual can not be wicked in your opinion. Those individuals God created to be in that class according to this and other verses.
    So as Bro James said, it is only one of many verses that supports election, but no verse should be used alone for any teaching.
     
  7. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not true. When someone says "God made the wicked for the day of evil" it is perfectly legitimate to read this as "God made the world in such a way as to ensure that some people will be wicked in order to fulfill his purposes, without specifying which specific persons these will be"

    And I am interested to know what texts you think support election.
     
  8. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    maybe you should rerad some of the threads on the topic of election, becasue many many verses have been shown to teach election.
     
  9. Dustin

    Dustin
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    696
    Likes Received:
    0
    Romans 9 also lays it out quite clearly.


    Soli Deo Gloria,
    Dustin
     
  10. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    You should know that I am not new to this matter. Please tell me what texts you think support election.
     
  11. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3


    GE:

    Maybe it will be a good thing to keep in mind, 'Behind the explosion of multiplied interpretations there is the sinister plot of the devil to undermine the belief that the bible is the word of God', and that Election is by the will of God, sovereignly -- that is, God, only, and, alone.
     
  12. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    "The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil."

    The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, BUT NOT, the wicked for the day of evil.

    Make your choice, Andre.
     
  13. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    GE:

    Not so easy! You cannot escape this one! In fact, the word, 'even', equals 'in fact', 'precisely', etc. "The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, ACTUALLY AND SPECIFICALLY (as over against "all things (otherwise)), the wicked for the day of evil."
     
  14. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    You think it is the will or by the will of the wicked that he or they is going to get the "day of evil"? Then you know nothing!
    So by whose will else then SHALL, the wiched get their "day of evil", i.e., hell, for their not only inevitable and deserved, but, by God gauranteed rewarded, "day of evil"?
     
  15. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is not a valid counterargument to the interpretation that I have raised. Here is the text again:

    The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil

    Even if you what you are claiming is true, this does not damage my argument. I can claim that this text is saying God "precisely, actually and specifically, made the class of wicked people for the day of evil, without enumerating specific members of this class". We are not required to read this text as enumerating or specifying specific persons for the day of evil.
     
  16. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is simply not a choice I am forced to make. Please refer to my preceding post. The "choice" you put before me is like asking me that famous question: "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
     
  17. Andre

    Andre
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is only in the sometimes odd and sometime intellectually inbred world of fundamentalist Christianity that such statements are made. When presented with an alternative explanation, and lacking no argument against it, a person can always invoke the tired "the person who does not share my view is a minion of Satan" argument. I would hope that we can do better. Imagine if a member of the scientific community reacted to challenges to the standard scientific worldview with such rhetoric. They would laughed out of town. And rightly so.
     
  18. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    GE:

    The Word says, "the wicked (men)" -- the damned, their names NOT being written in the Book of Life Jesus Christ, but written, in the books opened in the judgement. They are known by name and person as are the saved. From before the foundation of the world. According to God's will.

    Why not accept it? Because you cannot trust God? Then whom would you rather trust?
     
  19. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    GE:

    If I be laughed out of town for maintaining and stating, Election is by the will of God, sovereignly -- that is, God, only, and, alone, then so be it with great joy on my part. In fact, I am right here laughed out of town by you, Andre, for it. If it were otherwise, I would have worried.
     
  20. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    3
    Andre, you remind me of a theologian (feminine, late 19th century), who categorically stated something like this (it was very long ago): "There is no election but the election whereby man elects God".
     

Share This Page

Loading...