Educating Ron Paul

Ron Paul may be the only viable presidential candidate in a horse race fixed by the elite, but he is seriously mistaken about “al-Qaeda” and the role this phantom, CIA-ISI created “terror organization” plays in the highly profitable (for death merchants) WOT and the events of September 11, 2001. Mr. Paul told Ze’ev Barak—er Wolf Blitzer (the CNN anchor used the pen name Ze’ev Barak back in the day, when he reported for the Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth)—that he would go after “the threat” (as Blitzer characterized the dead nemesis, Osama bin Laden) and “we didn’t do what we were supposed to do” when the Pentagon invaded Afghanistan (see video below).

Of course, as we know, Osama bin Laden’s residency in Afghanistan—initially set up and bankrolled by the CIA and its Pakistan helper, the ISI—served as an excuse to invade the country.

As French authors Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie have documented, the United States threw its support behind the fanatical Taliban regime, itself a creation of the CIA-ISI alliance. According to Brisard and Dasquie, “the U.S. government saw the Taliban regime ‘as a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil pipeline across Central Asia’, from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean,” however, “confronted with Taliban’s refusal to accept U.S. conditions, ‘this rationale of energy security changed into a military one’…. At one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the Taliban, ‘either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs,’” Julio Godoy writes for Inter Press Service.

Congressman Paul is absolutely correct when he states that “we ignored” the supposed threat of Osama bin Laden, as the real target was not Bin Laden or his fellow cave dwellers but rather the Taliban, who were soon dislodged by way of cruise missile and bunker-buster, allowing the former Unocal employee and sock puppet Hamid Karzai to take up residency (on 27 December 2002, with the Taliban out of the way, the leaders of Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan signed a pipeline deal).

However, it appears Mr. Paul buys into the obviously contrived “threat” of the “al-Qaeda” bogeyman, as he admits he “voted for the money” to “go after” Osama bin Laden. Moreover, on November 29, 2001, Ron Paul told the House of Corporate Whores, er Representatives, that Congress knows “a lot about the terrorists who spilled the blood of nearly 4,000 innocent civilians. There were 19 of them, 15 from Saudi Arabia, and they have paid a high price. They’re all dead. So those most responsible for the attack have been permanently taken care of. If one encounters a single suicide bomber who takes his own life along with others without the help of anyone else, no further punishment is possible. The only question that can be raised under that circumstance is why did it happen and how can we change the conditions that drove an individual to perform such a heinous act.”

In short, Mr. Paul buys into the official, neocon-contrived version of events and attributes the attacks to a misguided foreign policy. As we know, there is no evidence hijackers were aboard the planes of September 11, 2001, and even less evidence there “were 19 of them, 15 from Saudi Arabia.” As the BBC reported days after the attacks, several of the alleged hijackers were alive and well, including Waleed Al Shehri, who protested his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.

Continue...

An Introduction to False Flag Terror


It has now been persuasively argued -- as shown, for example, in this History Channel video -- that Nazis set fire to their own government building and blamed that fire on others (if you have trouble playing the clip, it is because the website hosting the clip requires you to download the clip before playing it). The fire was the event which justified Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.

And in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government. See also this confirmation.


And the Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power.


The Turkish government has carried out bombings and blamed it on the PKK in order to justify a crackdown on that group.This is called "false flag terrorism", where a government attacks its own people then blames others in order to justify its goals

But NOT the U.S.

It is logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis), the U.S. has never done so.


Well, as shown by this BBC special (which contains interviews with some of the key players), it is probable that America knew of the Japanese plan to attack Pearl Harbor -- down to the exact date of the attack -- and allowed it to happen to justify America's entry into World War II. See also this short essay by a highly-praised historian summarizing some of the key points (the historian, a World War II veteran, actually agreed with this strategy for getting America into the war, and so does not have any axe to grind). The Pearl Harbor conspiracy involved hundreds of military personnel. Moreover, the White House apparently had, a year earlier, launched an 8-point plan to provoke Japan into war against the U.S. (including, for example, an oil embargo). And -- most stunning -- the FDR administration took numerous affirmative steps to ensure that the Japanese attack would be successful.



SOURCE

 

That's okay, that's how people react when they know they can't muster even a little bit of evidence to "prove" what they think they believe to be true.