Entirety of Scripture

You just don't get it.

 

For the umpteenth time, QS, it's NOT the KJV we're against; we're against the man-made false doctrine that the KJV is the ONLY valid English Bible translation. We point out discrepancies in the KJV only to prove wrong the KJVO claim that the KJV is perfect. We're NOT trying to discredit the KJV as the KJVOs are trying to discredit all other versions, but we do NOT believe the KJV is perfect, either, and it's been proven.

KJVO IS A FALSE, MAN-MADE MYTH.

 

In deference to our brothers I will now change my use of the acronymous KJVO designation to KJBO.

Regarding the entirety of scripture - I do not think that the KJB contradicts itself anywhere. As I have said in other posts I think the true inspiration of scripture comes when the Holy Spirit writes the "words" of scripture on the heart of a believer who reads the black marks on the paper (or an a manuscript). To look for contradictions in scripture is wrong-headed. Scripture IS cohesive and DOES fit together without a problem. To compare a passage from Chronicles with one from Kings and say, "look it's a little different" is just silly - of course they're a little different; they were written by different hands and different times. God is not mocked - we've got just what He wants us to have!

The KJB has been around for a long time. I doubt God would have allowed it to flourish if it had significant errors. I think that its words are quite sufficient to hold the truth of God. I also believe that certain MVs (NKJV, NIV, NASB, ESV) also contain sufficient verbage to communicate God's word.

 

Methinks that BrianT is correct that the KJVO's (like QS) just don't get it. No one here thinks that the problems arise with regard to the KJV itself, but rather with those who promote a KJV-only position. When faced with the same (stupid) arguments that KJVO's make against the MV's when we 'turn the tables' on making the same arguments against the KJV, we prove absurdity by being absurd (something taken from Rush!). Dealing with KJVO's is like dealing with political liberals. When given that same medicine which the KJVO's shovel out, the KJVO is flummoxed by their own type of nonsense.

 

Hey QuickeningSpirit, don't you get it? I got it. Let me show you.

You and I believe that God inspired and preserved his words perfectly. The modernist believe that, since God is too busy in answering prays, holding the Earth in space, along with the Moon and Sun and all the other planets, that he cannot do this.

See, that wasn't hard was it.

 

Amen to that! Tanzania has approximately 120 ethnic groups, and most of the population speaks a Bantu language. The "persevered" KJV doesn't preserve God's word very well for these people.

 

Homebound, you just don't get it either.

 

The typical KJVO tries to discredit all other English versions, but his usual excuse is, "It aint the KJV." That like saying apples aint oranges. To deny that a popular BV is not valid is a serious thing. It became popular for a reason, and he/she who fights against may find themselves FIGHTING GOD.

We anti-KJVOismists, on the other hand, have no agenda to push, no doctrine to defend, no myth to try to prove, no Bible version with which we are at war. We merely reject the KJVO myth for its total lack of substantiating evidence. It's the KJVO who began these debates, so he/she has the burden of proof, and so far it's been all burden & no proof for the KJVO.

 

Was anyone picking on you? You've made your views known in previous posts, and so have the rest of us. I suppose you could post all the pro-KJV or pro-KJVO stuff you wish, but when you do, expect a large riposte since you hold the view of only a small minority here.

 

So, whoever said that it did?

 

Sure, I understand? Do you? If so, please succinctly state it so we will all know that you do really understand.