Episcopal Church votes to curb gay bishops

Discussion in '2006 Archive' started by carpro, Jun 21, 2006.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    299
    http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2006-06-21T201448Z_01_N21310194_RTRUKOC_0_US-RELIGION-EPISCOPALS.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

    Episcopal Church votes to curb gay bishops
    Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:15pm ET

    EXCERPT

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (Reuters) - The U.S. Episcopal Church, trying to appease an angry and alienated worldwide Anglican community, reversed itself on Wednesday and agreed to try to avoid the consecration of more openly gay bishops.

    The action came 24 hours after one of two legislative bodies at the 2.3 million member U.S. church's convention had rejected a similar idea.

    The non-binding resolution adopted at the convention calls on those in authority "to exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate (for bishop) whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion."
     
  2. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    TRY to avoid?? I can't think of any reason they couldn't avoid having an openly gay minister period, much less in the position of bishop.

    They've obviously lost their collective mind.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,386
    Likes Received:
    790
    Niether is there any reason not to aviod a closet homosexual from getting in the pulpit.

    Pray and fast and wait on God.:thumbs:
     
  4. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sorry, but I can't tell whether you are saying
    • A - There is reason to avoid secret homosexuals from being appointed, or
    • B - There is no reason to avoid appointing a non-practicing gay person
    If you would, please clarify.
     

Share This Page

Loading...