By "The Person of the Son," I mean His two natures and how each nature relate to the other and to God. MISUNDERSTANDING # I. The Eternal Role Subordination of the Son. (in 3 anticipated parts) Isn't it astonishing that the Bible is said to be understandable and yet agreement about the Person of Christ --the very Center of our Faith-- cannot be reached by Evangelical experts on the Bible?!! I.1: The Misunderstanding Stated. GROUP 1 Bruce A. Ware,Wayne Grudem,Bruce Demarest, Gordon Lewis,Stephen Kovach, , Scott Horrell, John Dahms, Dennis Ray Burke Jr and others assert that Christ as God is eternally relationally subordinate to the Father. i.e., GOD MUST ETERNALLY OBEY GOD!!! GROUP 2 On the other hand, Millard Erickson,JO Buswell, RA Torrey,BB Warfield, Loraine Boettner, Robert Reymond, John Feinberg and others reject that tenet holding that the Son's obedience is temporal only. I AGREE with this 2nd group. But OBVIOUSLY,one group is wrong and by them Christ is partially misunderstood! Now the temptation may be to believe that Christ is the God-Man is quite enough, and that "digging " further into Christology is unprofitable. However, each group bases its arguments on Scripture. To understand Scripture includes understanding Scripture about Christ! What is revealed belongs to us! Toward that goal, I will assemble and review my thoughts on this subject and will soon respond to arguments of Group 1 and explain my arguments for my agreeing with Group 2. It's great to have this place to unload. Thanks for reading. Bill Grover, BA, ThB in Bible (Linda Vista Baptist) ; MA in Theology (Point Loma Nazarene) ; Teaching Credentials (Univ San Diego & Oregon State); MDiv (Equivalency) and THM in Bible (Western Seminary) ThD in Systematic Theology (Unizul). Special education teacher 1969-2005; Grad Faculty, SATS 2006-Present.