What do you think about him? No you personally, and not what some blogger or website thinks which may be incorrect? I am reading his latest book and I can sense a zeal for the lost. However I also sense a misunderstanding of Reformed theology, and a arrogant attitude to admit he does not know everything. However his zeal for the lost leaks though the pages of his book. His writing style is awkward at times, and very unfocused. However I could say the same of Ray Comfort. Not a seasoned writer, but a good writer for todays ADD readers. Writing a academic level work is not the same as writing a book for the average ADD reader of today. I think that Cahill does a good job in keeping ones attention in his book. What do you say? I can learn from Arminian just as long as I show discernment with their books and teachings. However I think it would be unwise to not invite one to my conference because of secondary disputes.