Everything We Have Been Taught About Our Origins Is A Lie

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Revmitchell, Jun 25, 2014.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    It is currently accepted by science and geology that coal is a by-product of decaying vegetation. The vegetation becomes buried over time and is covered with sediment. That sediment eventually fossilises and becomes rock. This natural process of coal formation takes up to 400 million years to accomplish.

    Anything that is found in lumps of coal or in coal seams during mining, had to have been placed or dropped into the vegetation before it was buried in sediment.

    ....In 1944, as a ten year old boy, Newton Anderson, dropped a lump of coal in his basement and it broke in half as it hit the floor. What he discovered inside defies explanation based upon current scientific orthodoxy.

    Inside the coal was a hand crafted brass alloy bell with an iron clapper and sculptured handle.

    When an analysis was carried out it was discovered that the bell was made from anunusual mix of metals, different from any known modern alloy production (including copper, zinc, tin, arsenic, iodine, and selenium).

    The seam from whence this lump of coal was mined is estimated to be 300,000,000 years old!

    - See more at: http://www.maltanow.com.mt/?p=2927#sthash.RyArPy2K.dpuf
     
  2. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,147
    Likes Received:
    322
    But Rev, the "bell" just as the coal had no doubt come together by chance after a very long series of circumstances (we would probably be told).


    HankD
     
  3. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. SolaSaint

    SolaSaint
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    25
    I took a class on oil and coal formation and it was a great study. They could get good results with the right conditions of heat and pressure in a very short time to produce coal. They also did a study that shows most of the great oil deposits world wide were proof of a world wide flood and quick burial that is also a requirement for this formation. Good stuff.

    Here's a good link" http://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=51
     
  5. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,655
    Likes Received:
    225
    I've searched the Answers in Genesis and the CRI sites for "London Hammer," and nothing came up.

    Just wondering how this has to do with the OP?
     
  6. HAMel

    HAMel
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,048
    Likes Received:
    83
    You should check out the Forbidden Archeology websites. A lot of strange stuff indeed.
     
  7. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unless I am mistaken, it too was featured in article referenced in the OP.
     
  8. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,655
    Likes Received:
    225
    Aside from the host of assumptions and manipulation in many dating methods, one doesn't need millions of years to make coal, rock, or diamonds. All one needs are the right conditions.
     
  9. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,655
    Likes Received:
    225
    So it is. Your source stated it was commonly cited by Creationists. Expected to see it on either of the sites I referenced if it was.
     
  10. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even mathematics, the Queen of the sciences has foundations of assumptions. Does theology?
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,080
    Likes Received:
    49
    o
    Proper theology has facts, not assumptions, as we take all theology frm the Bible, what gets assumed though is that we can rightly divide those facts!
     
  12. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,655
    Likes Received:
    225
    Name one. I'll bet it's not like the un substantiated assumptions in dating methods. Fossils date the rocks.
     
  13. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,195
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Yes, even theology has assumptions. The bible never tries to prove the existence of God. It merely assumes it.

    "In the beginning God . . . " :)
     
  14. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,195
    Likes Received:
    1,315
  15. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definition of a point.....a mathematical assumption. I think you read and accept too many opposing views on the science of various dating techniques. Like it or not...the math (and science) is solid.

    http://debunkingdenialism.com/2011/...org/article/mark-226-and-problem-abiatharons/

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/101_evidences_for_a_young_age_of_the_Earth_and_the_universe
     
    #15 quantumfaith, Jun 28, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 28, 2014
  16. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you tcassidy.....that is the very nature and posture of science....and mathematics. When new math (or science) is discovered it goes through rigorous professional review. Case in point, Dr. Andrew Wiles proof of Fermats Last Theorem.....His first proposal (after 10 years of work) was shown to contain some minor errors, and then they were corrected. Science ALWAYS leaves itself open to further investigation and refinement, without that intellectual posture it would be quite difficult to make advancements.
     

Share This Page

Loading...