Exclusive: CIA Whistleblower Exposes Secret of Benghazi

Discussion in 'Politics' started by poncho, May 3, 2014.

  1. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Infowars.com
    May 3, 2014

    Alex speaks with famed whistleblower William Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, a former CIA contract pilot who covertly flew munitions for the agency, joins the show to break down the extensive cover-up of Benghazi, including the program that saw weapons smuggled out of Benghazi by the CIA to terrorists in Syria.

    Listen Here . . . http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-cia-whistleblower-exposes-secret-of-benghazi/
     
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    299
    All for naught.

    Congress is afraid of Obama. He can get away with anything from using the IRS as a political tool to covering up a Benghazi.

    The law means nothing to him.
     
  3. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
  4. SolaSaint

    SolaSaint
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,824
    Likes Received:
    25
    I'm afraid Carpo is correct. Any other Prez would have been impeached by now. Obama has the race card and the GOP is afraid of it. They're all cowards. It probably also means we get 8 more years of Billary. Oh so much fun for us. Better line up early for the soup lines. It will be mandatory ya know.....lol
     
  5. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Carpro is usually correct when it comes to the calling out the democrats for their crimes.
     
  6. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Carney’s Response to Benghazi Emails is Criminal

    As the White House continues to spin the Benghazi scandal, it has become increasingly clear that this is an administration that is perfectly content with lying to the American people. The question Americans have to ask themselves is whether they have become an electorate that is content to listen.

    White House Press Secretary Jay Carney assumed the latter this week, claiming that new Benghazi documents linking the White House to the cover-up were not actually about Benghazi at all – “it was explicitly not about Benghazi”, Carney said, going so far as to suggest that discussing the cover-up makes for a “conspiracy theory”. In the face of the new evidence, Carney’s words are nothing short of shameless.

    Of course, Carney’s explanation makes little sense when taking into account that Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, which revealed the White House connection, explicitly demanded records from the State Department relating to talking points given to Susan Rice about Benghazi.

    Read More At: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/05/carneys-response-benghazi-emails-criminal/
     
  7. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,468
    Likes Received:
    138
    Blow that whistle....

    .... and sound the trumpets in Zion! it is time to let America know that Obama and the WH was more interested in defending his reign as POYUS for a second possible term then defending the Americans at Benghazi...
     
  8. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Okay you do that while I let Americans know Washington has been funding, arming and using Islamic extremists and terrorists as proxy destabilization forces in it's long running regime change efforts with American's tax dollars while also using the same Islamic extremists and terrorists as boogeymen to turn America into a Stasi style militarized police state and repeal our rights and freedoms.

    I'd like to see Obama and Clinton behind bars because they are traitors, thieves, murderers and usurpers not because they are democrats.
     
    #8 poncho, May 5, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2014
  9. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    :thumbsup: The only hope we have is to vote 'em all out of office. I've about decided there isn't a single incumbant that gets my vote in the primary in August. We've sent Sen. Pat Roberts to Washington for 47 years!!! The man doesn't even own a house he occupies in Kansas anymore. We need to vote him out simply because he doesn't meet the residency requirements. :laugh:
     
  10. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Vote em out? :laugh:

    You can't vote an oligarchy out of office silly, they were never voted in. You can make yourself feel useful by replacing their old puppets with new ones every once in a while though.

    You really are a funny guy TND! :laugh:
     
    #10 poncho, May 5, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2014
  11. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    #11 poncho, May 5, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2014
  12. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    The 4 Deeper Truths about Benghazi and Libya

    Democrats and Republicans Are Both Missing the Big Picture On Benghazi and Libya

    Democrats and Republicans have very different views about Benghazi, Libya.

    Republicans say the Obama administration is to blame for the death of Ambassador Stevens – and have created a special committee to investigate Benghazi – while Democrats by and large say that the is nothing but politics.

    The truth is bigger than either side is admitting …

    First, Pulitzer prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh – who broke the story of the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam under Nixon and the torture scandal under Bush – says that Benghazi was really a CIA outpost for running weapons capture from Libya after Gaddaffi was overthrown into Syria … approved on a bipartisan basis by both Democrats and Republicans.

    Second, it has been confirmed that the U.S. backed Al Qaeda terrorists in Libya so that they would overthrow Gaddaffi.

    Third, as we noted right after Gaddaffi fell, the Obama administration’s stated reason for going into Libya makes no sense. Now, RAND Corporation political scientists theorize that Obama might have decided to bomb Libya – not for any reason having to do with Libya or Gaddaffi themselves – but rather “to keep the Arab Spring going“.

    The U.S. ousted Gaddaffi and then left, and Libya has now descended into chaos.

    The Washington Post argues that America fighting the Libyan war is a bigger scandal than Benghazi itself:

    < snip >

    Those are four the deeper stories about Benghazi and Libya which neither the Democrats or Republicans are talking about …

    Read More At: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/05/democrats-republicans-missing-benghazi-libya.html
     
  13. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,949
    Likes Received:
    299
    Ne secrets there.

    We've known from day 1 that Obama was backing al qaeda in Libya.
     
  14. FollowTheWay

    FollowTheWay
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2013
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    4
    This so-called scandel is nothing compared with the refusal of Bush and Cheney to testify under oath to the 9/11 committee. Let's hear the truth about 9/11. Why did they refuse to testify? Also, why wasn't Bush impeached for lying about weapons of mass destruction and for outing an undercover CIA agent, Valarie Plame, because her husband questioned the existence of yellow cake uranium from S Africa?
     
  15. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    You know what really turns me off to republicans? I'll give ya a hint. The same thing that turns me off to democrats. They're always trying to deflect blame away from their own guilt by pointing out someone else's.

    Is Bush guilty of crimes? Yes! Is Obama guilty of crimes? Yes!

    Why does the criminality of our government keeping getting more blatant by the day?

    Because neither "side" has the integrity to admit their side is guilty of committing crimes against the people they are supposed to be serving. Neither side has the integrity to hold their own accountable.

    Look at the last two posts. Perfect examples.

    The democrats and republicans are both guilty of sponsoring terrorists at one time or another. The R's try to place it all on the D's and the D's try to place it all on the R's.

    The net effect is while both sides are living in denial and pointing crooked fingers at each other the government continues to get away with sponsoring terrorists.

    Divided we stand while the government get's away with murder.
     
    #15 poncho, May 8, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2014
  16. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
  17. FollowTheWay

    FollowTheWay
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2013
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'm simply saying that Bush's crimes were far, far worse than anything President Obama has done. Was it a higher priority to try Nazi war criminals or a petty shlplifter?
     
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,387
    Likes Received:
    790
    First no one lied about wmd's. Apparenlty you do not know but there is not one single democrat that did not believe there was wmd's:

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

    "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
     
  19. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,387
    Likes Received:
    790
    Second Plame was not any longer an "under cover agent". I suggest you read your history.
     
  20. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    What a bunch of garbage! This was settled three years ago and liberals continue to lie about it.

    As admitted in what was practically a closet editorial by the Democrats' "house organ," it was nothing but lies from the start.
    The liberal rag makes a limp wave at trying to lay at least some blame on the White House, but its all garbage. Wilson lied, then back-stabbed his own wife in an effort to deflect attention from himself. He's slime, and you need to stop lying about any "Bush involvement." There was none.

    All the Democrats ever do is lie. They lied about everything the Bush administration did, trying to paint it all as underhanded, conniving, illegal. No truth to it whatsoever. And now they lie to cover up their own underhanded, conniving, illegal activities at the IRS, over the Benghazi attack, Fast & Furious, and a dozen other scandals the ruling powers in Washington think they can sweep under the rug. They're wrong. The truth will come out, just like it did regarding Valarie Plame. Duck, FTW, because the stuff is coming down.
     
    #20 thisnumbersdisconnected, May 9, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 9, 2014

Share This Page

Loading...