Faith based programs and the law

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Helen, Jun 22, 2003.

  1. Helen

    Helen
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thought this might interest you folks:

    ==========

    "To put it another way, critics of the faith-based approach may claim that their only issue is with religion. But if these results are any clue, increasingly the argument against such programs requires turning a blind eye to science."
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110003652


    REVIEW & OUTLOOK

    Jesus Saves
    How President Bush found himself hugging a murderer in the White House.

    Friday, June 20, 2003 12:01 a.m.

    That's not quite the way a University of Pennsylvania report puts it. But that's the underlying message of a just-released study confirming sharply reduced recidivism rates for Texas inmates who've completed an innovative joint venture between Chuck Colson's Prison Fellowship Ministries and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Which explains how President Bush found himself in the Roosevelt Room on Wednesday shaking hands with a convicted murderer.
    The theology underlying the idea is as old as the Apostles: sin and redemption. And the InnerChange Freedom Initiative incorporates these notions into a three-phase program. In the first phase, the aim is to build a moral foundation in prisoners through biblical study, work, support groups and mentoring. The second phase introduces off-site work (e.g., with Habitat for Humanity) that helps reintroduce prisoners to the community. Phase III is the support given an ex-offender after he has been released, to keep (no pun intended) his spirits up and help him with everything from jobs to housing to family.


    The president comes by his enthusiasm for this program honestly. As governor of Texas, George W. Bush was the first to put it into operation in America. In this regard the ex-con the president bear-hugged at the White House on Wednesday is something of an old friend: He's the same man then-Gov. Bush was photographed with his arm around during a 1997 visit to a Texas prison, both of them singing "Amazing Grace."
    That man has now turned his life around, and he's not the only one, judging from the findings by Byron Johnson of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.

    In a nutshell, Mr. Johnson found that those who completed all three program phases were "significantly less likely than the matched groups" to be either arrested (17.3% vs. 35%) or incarcerated (only 8% vs. 20.3%) in the first two years after release.

    Here's how spiritual conversion reads in academese: "Narratives of IFI members revealed five spiritual transformation themes that are consistent with characteristics long associated with offender rehabilitation: (a) I'm not who I used to be; (b) spiritual growth; (c) God versus the prison code; (d) positive outlook on life; and (e) the need to give back to society."

    All this, no doubt, will be profoundly discomforting to those who like the results but don't like the religion; a similar program in Iowa is already being sued by the Americans United for Separation of Church and State. But the question is joined: Can you achieve the positive social outcomes of faith-based programs if you strip out the faith?
    As Penn's John DiIulio reminds us, the positive findings about the InnerChange Freedom Initiative parallel more than 500 other studies showing that the "faith factor" often makes faith-based programs more effective than their purely secular counterparts.

    To put it another way, critics of the faith-based approach may claim that their only issue is with religion. But if these results are any clue, increasingly the argument against such programs requires turning a blind eye to science.


    Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
     
  2. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am glad the program has positive results.

    I don't like a convicted murderer walking the streets regardless of whether he has been converted. One still must pay for his crime. And a murderer should be executed. If his victim was not a Christian, his victim never had further opportunity to turn his "life around" as the murderer did.

    Oh well, so much for the American justice system. :(
     
  3. Ben W

    Ben W
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would agree that a Convicted murderer should pay a severe punishment for his crime irrespective of his faith.

    Yet I would also like to point out that we can apply Grace in the situation, and allow that person to live, just like what happened with King David when he killed the Egyptian and Cain when God put a mark on him. In spite of what they had done, Grace was applied.
     
  4. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    ...and then there was Ted Bundy who claimed that he had found Jesus Christ before he went on to be executed.
     
  5. Johnv

    Johnv
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's easier to find Jesus before one's execution than after.
     
  6. Bartimaeus

    Bartimaeus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Messages:
    909
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those conversions will always be with us because they have been with us from the beginning. One of two malefactors at Golgotha was converted, (yet not released).

    Thanks -------Bart
    Edited for Spelling
     

Share This Page

Loading...