Federal Assault On Brown Home Was Aborted

So who is Ed Brown and what has he done that requires the federal government to raid his home?

 

This Ed Brown, perhaps ?

 

I assume that there is proof of these accusations? And how exactly would this constitute a "siege?"

 

The report was the testimony of Danny Riley. The proof of his testimony can be found on Youtube. The proof of the accuracy of his testimony can not be currently had as the authority that would investigate such things, is the authority that is perpetrating such things.

SIEGE, n. [L. sigillum.]

1. The setting of an army around or before a fortified place for the purpose of compelling the garrison to surrender; (Source: Webster's 1828)​

Ed & Elaine Brown are in a fortified position. The U.S. Marshalls had boots on the ground on the Brown property, armored vehicles and a helicopter outside the property. How exactly would this not constitute a "siege"?

 

So he has proof that he was shot at? He has proof that he was threatened?

 

He has his testimony that he was shot at and he has his testimony he was threatened. Do the Marshalls have proof they didn't shoot at him, do the Marshalls have proof that they didn't threaten him?

 

Isn't this America? Don't we offer the accused the advantage of being innocent until proven guilty?

 

If a man is tasered in the woods and no jury gets to hear it, did it make a sound?

 

Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist

 

This story being followed on Coast to Coast AM see www.coasttocoastam.com

There is no law that requires a citizen of the USofA to pay an income tax on personal income. Try calling your IRS and asking for the citation number for the law so you can read it for yourself. Might use a pay phone.

 

How about this one?

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

 

And the congressional legislation which implements this permission?

 

Oh, wait, you mean there isn't any?

 

I do know that every person who has contested the payment of federal income taxes and has followed it through to the end, has won. However, there have only been about 1,000 people willing to do this, because they lost everything in the process. But, they are free for the rest of their lives.

 

Sounds like its time for a class action law suit.

 

So an activist who supposes that the government is out to take our freedom and commit illegal search ans seizure then stumbles upon such an act in progress. Is this irony, coincidence, or myth?


How about a big fat Myth

 

Most people who beat the system work 100% off the books and don't own any sort of bank or financial accounts.

 

Which brings up the question: Since about 75% of Federal spending is illegal, and the income tax is questionable at best, is it wrong to keep someone from extorting money from you? If it's illegal taxation, it's not Caesar's.