Federal Assault On Brown Home Was Aborted

Discussion in '2007 Archive' started by poncho, Jun 10, 2007.

  1. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Man fired upon and captured tells story of being ordered to lie to media by FBI and cover up botched raid.

    <snip>

    Danny Riley, the man who was shot at and arrested after he discovered U.S. Marshals stalking Ed Brown's home, has revealed the amazing truth behind how he was threatened with 15 years in jail by the FBI unless he lied to the media to cover-up the fact that yesterday's events were a planned siege and not merely to serve a warrant as authorities had claimed.

    Riley related in a video blog late yesterday how he had unwittingly stumbled across U.S. Marshals preparing to raid the Brown property as he left the house to take Ed Brown's dog for a walk. Riley was confronted by two men in camouflage who fired two shots at him as he attempted to run away, but was then tackled by 12 other armed Marshals who tasered and handcuffed him.


    What happened after was carried in our article this morning , but the whole story exposes how the FBI had planned to orchestrate a violent raid on the Brown's property, before aborting the siege and attempting to use Riley, under intimidation that he would be jailed or even killed, as a go-between to sell the cover-story to the media that the authorities were merely serving a warrant.

    Riley now fears for his life but has shown tremendous courage in coming forward to lift the lid and expose the lies that the New Hampshire police told the media in downplaying yesterday's events and hiding the fact that they were planning a raid.

    <snip>

    Riley was then ordered to lie to the media and tell them that during his morning walk, he had not seen armed U.S. Marshals but plain clothed police officers who were merely serving a warrant for the seizure of the Brown's dental office 10 miles away, and that the officers had simply tackled and not shot at or tasered him after he ran. Riley was told that if he didn't lie to the media he was facing certain prison time or even death.

    SOURCE

    Respect our 'authoritay' or else! Meanwhile reporters who ask questions the 'authoritays' would rather not answer are also being arrested, intimidated and/or threatened.
     
    #1 poncho, Jun 10, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 10, 2007
  2. Baptist Believer

    Baptist Believer
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Likes Received:
    188
    So who is Ed Brown and what has he done that requires the federal government to raid his home?
     
  3. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,123
    Likes Received:
    1
    This Ed Brown, perhaps ?

     
  4. IronWill

    IronWill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    I assume that there is proof of these accusations? And how exactly would this constitute a "siege?"
     
  5. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    The report was the testimony of Danny Riley. The proof of his testimony can be found on Youtube. The proof of the accuracy of his testimony can not be currently had as the authority that would investigate such things, is the authority that is perpetrating such things.


    SIEGE, n. [L. sigillum.]

    1. The setting of an army around or before a fortified place for the purpose of compelling the garrison to surrender; (Source: Webster's 1828)​

    Ed & Elaine Brown are in a fortified position. The U.S. Marshalls had boots on the ground on the Brown property, armored vehicles and a helicopter outside the property. How exactly would this not constitute a "siege"?
     
  6. IronWill

    IronWill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    So he has proof that he was shot at? He has proof that he was threatened?
     
  7. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    He has his testimony that he was shot at and he has his testimony he was threatened. Do the Marshalls have proof they didn't shoot at him, do the Marshalls have proof that they didn't threaten him?
     
  8. IronWill

    IronWill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't this America? Don't we offer the accused the advantage of being innocent until proven guilty?
     
  9. James_Newman

    James_Newman
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    If a man is tasered in the woods and no jury gets to hear it, did it make a sound?
     
  10. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Sure but only if they're pro war and torture. Everyone else that questions the authorities should be considered a terrorist with no habeas corpus or fourth amendment protections arrested flown to secret CIA prisons over seas, denied council, due process and visitors never to be heard from again. And no this isn't America. Welcome to Neo-America! Please pardon our police state, we're trying to build a North American Union here!
     
    #10 poncho, Jun 11, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2007
  11. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
  12. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    This story being followed on Coast to Coast AM see www.coasttocoastam.com

    There is no law that requires a citizen of the USofA to pay an income tax on personal income. Try calling your IRS and asking for the citation number for the law so you can read it for yourself. Might use a pay phone.
     
  13. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    How about this one?

    "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
     
  14. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    And the congressional legislation which implements this permission?
     
  15. James_Newman

    James_Newman
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh, wait, you mean there isn't any?
     
  16. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do know that every person who has contested the payment of federal income taxes and has followed it through to the end, has won. However, there have only been about 1,000 people willing to do this, because they lost everything in the process. But, they are free for the rest of their lives.
     
  17. James_Newman

    James_Newman
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds like its time for a class action law suit.
     
  18. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0
    So an activist who supposes that the government is out to take our freedom and commit illegal search ans seizure then stumbles upon such an act in progress. Is this irony, coincidence, or myth?


    How about a big fat Myth
     
  19. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Most people who beat the system work 100% off the books and don't own any sort of bank or financial accounts.
     
  20. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which brings up the question: Since about 75% of Federal spending is illegal, and the income tax is questionable at best, is it wrong to keep someone from extorting money from you? If it's illegal taxation, it's not Caesar's.
     

Share This Page

Loading...