Federal Courts and the Growth of Government Power

Discussion in 'Politics' started by KenH, Jan 17, 2006.

  1. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Congressman Ron Paul's latest excellent column:

    LINK
     
  2. fromtheright

    fromtheright
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    I respect Ron Paul but, while I agree with his tone that Supreme Court precedents are given too much weight, he is misleading:

    Alito never said that and in fact did say that precedents are subject to being overturned.
     
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    It is the democrats who believe: "Supreme Court decisions are the absolute law of the land, equal in weight to the text of the Constitution itself. Supreme Court precedents should never be changed, and all nominees to the Court must accept them as settled law or be disqualified." Of course if the Court finds Roe v Wade is unconstitutionsl the democrats will be the first to change their tune on precedent."

    They [the dems] tried to get Alito to state that Roe v Wade was "settled law" or the law of the land. Apparently Roberts stated that R v W was settled law but later amended that to state that it was settled precedent, the same approach that Alito took.
     
  4. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that Congressman Paul is talking about the conventional wisdom in Washington.
     

Share This Page

Loading...