1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Fundamentalism, Gnosticism, and Quaker "inner light"

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Siegfried, Dec 16, 2002.

  1. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ben W, does the Bible have to explicitly say everything God does or doesn't do?

    You are arguing from silence. There are plenty of people who embrace the idea that once the Spirit completed the N.T., he was done with revelation (not the book).
     
  2. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for your definition.

    I don't think we really disagree that much, at least on paper. I don't deny that the Spirit's illumination of the Word affects our application of biblical truth. Certainly James teaches that God is the source of wisdom for living godly lives in difficult circumstances.

    You may say that I'm splitting hairs, but I think there's a big difference between saying "God helped me wisely apply biblical principles to my decision to marry Peggy Sue," and "God told me to marry Peggy Sue."

    As to the passage you quote, I'm unconvinced that it's a promise for the kind of guidance that we're talking about. For instance, is God still showing people "things to come"? Some would say yes, but I believe the canon is closed, and special revelation has ceased in this age. Is it not possible that Christ was explaining to the disciples that God would use the Holy Spirit to inspire Scripture through them? 2 Peter 1:20-21, for example.
     
  3. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be unreasonable for me to say that the Holy Spirit cannot work in this way, since He did it at least once.

    It would also be unreasonable for you to conclude from one example in Scripture that He did it frequently and that He's still doing it today.

    We know that the Spirit spoke audibly to Philip because inspired, inerrant Scripture says so. If an uninspiried, errant human tells me the Spirit
    spoke audibly to him, should I automatically conclude that his report is true?

    My basic point is that your view has been rejected by the early church fathers and by our Baptist ancestors.
     
  4. 2peter1_10

    2peter1_10 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Siegfried
    I am not saying that I endorse the idea that God literally tells someone "Thou shalt marry Peggy Sue." It is more of someone asking God "May I marry Peggy Sue,” in which God gives a peace that is clearly saying that it is O.K. It is here that saying, "God told me to marry Peggy Sue." In fact if someone makes that statement then I ask him or her to explain what he or she mean. Sometimes it is these "hair splitting" that will determine the quality of someone’s theology. Split the hairs, but do not go militant on them. Some people think that we must believe identically. It does not happen in this world. However, never compromise of the clear and foundational doctrines.

    The point that I was trying to make with the quoted was that the Holy Spirit guidance goes beyond just making a passage more understandable but includes the application. "Things to come" would not mean new revelation to us. Revelation 22:18-19 closed that to us. In the application to us, I would say that the Holy Spirit is giving us understanding on how things are working out to the fulfillment of Biblical prophesy (as in the nation of Israel now exists where it suppose to be for the end times).
     
  5. Ben W

    Ben W Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    6
    Preach the Word, You need to realise that the Holy Spirit speaking to somebody is not giving that person fresh revelation. The Bible is specifically clear that it was finished being written in Rev 22:18-19, The Holy Spirit is speaking to people and giving them "Words of Knowledge" as mentioned in 1Cor 12:8. Phillip recieved a word to go and speak to somebody about Jesus Christ much the same as those who know the voice of the Holy Spirit recieve the same types of words today. God is Consistent with His Word, He works in many different ways, but none that go against His word, for that reason everything God does is contained in his word.

    Seigfried, Yes I agree with you that the operation of Spiritual gifts did seem to quieten down in the early church, there is not alot of mention of Spiritual Gifts after the third century. The Christadelphian church teach that Spiritual Gifts are not for today, using as a basis for there theory 1Cor 13:8, however if we go down to verse 10 we can see that these things shall pass away when that which is perfect has come. This was written 50-70 years after the perfect one had come, prior to the gift of tounges being given. It is telling us that when Jesus Christ returns, These thing will pass away, but only then. Until that day Spiritual Gifts are for the church to use as God wills.

    In 1905 when the Pentecostal Revival hit Azuza Street, We saw the reintroduction of Gods spiritual gifts. The lukewarm spiritualness of people began to get hot. There is much that is wrong with the modern capatilist based church, But there are also others going after the early church model as expoused in the bible. We have to be goverened by the bible. Gods word is true, many stray from it. Particularly when they follow the modern day doctrines of mammon. Spiritual Gifts are simply yet another way God uses us.
     
  6. Molly

    Molly New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2000
    Messages:
    2,303
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ben,Has God spoke to you? What did he say? How did you know it was God? Were you standing,sitting? How did you *know*,without a shadow of a doubt,it was God speaking? Can you give evidence to support this?
    What is it a voice you could audibly hear? What did His voice sound like?

    This is very interesting to me.
     
  7. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    And I'm saying that I don't think there's any real difference between saying "God told me" and "God gave me peace." Where does your theology of peace as an indicator of God's will come from?

    The original audience was the disciples in a very specific historical context in which Christ was preparing the disciples for His absence.

    I would encourage you to read chapter 16 looking for Christ's usage of "you." Your argument is predicated on "you" meaning all believers from that moment on. Yet at least eigheen times in the chapter Christ refers to "you" in such a way that it can only be referring to his immediate audience, the disciples. Not one time does he use "you" in such a way that it MUST include later generations of believers.

    It seems to be a dangerous hermeneutic to take the passage and try to make it apply to us when there are so many signs that the primary reference to future revelation is the Holy Spirit's inspiration of the NT through the disciples.
     
  8. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not arguing that all spiritual gifts have ceased. I do believe that there is a strong case that the sign gifts referred to in 1 Cor. 13 have ceased. I'm not going to be dogmatic on this interpretation, but "that which is perfect" could also be referring to the canon of Scripture.

    Be that as it may, it seems that we would agree that "fresh revelation" has ceased. Could you define for me the difference between "fresh revelation" and "words of knowledge"? I'm struggling to conceive of what that difference could be.

    I'm not advocating lukewarm spirituality. I am denying that sign gifts are the primary indicator of spiritual "heat." Certainly there are many Baptist churches that do not have visible presence of sign gifts yet are not spiritually lukewarm.

    There is no doubt that many strains of Pentecostalism do not follow the simple rules that Paul taught concerning the use of sign gifts. That fact alone demonstrates that this alleged use of spiritual gifts is fraudulent, disobedient, and in no way an indicator of spiritual vitality.

    We're now far afield from the scope of this topic. If you want to discuss "Baptist Pentecostalism" (whatever that is) you should probably start a thread on it.
     
  9. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Called to ministry. That is a good question. If I may use my own example. I wanted architecture, but my parents chose ministry. Albeit, they expected the Anglican vicarage and not Baptist.

    In short, I studied both; theology and architecture. Whilst in Bible College, I received numerous invites to preach the Word, and not one invite to design a building. It would appear that God was opening doors of opportunity and closing others. Was this a call? Was this an inner light? Call it what you may, but one goes readily through open doors to succeed. There is a sense where the natural man has followed a direction in the human world, and there is a sense where it seems evident that God is leading in that direction.

    The call to ministry was made by the church and not by me. They determined that I was called and hence invited other like churches to sit in council and determine whether or not I was equipped to be a minister. Please remember, it was my personal desire to be an architect, but there was an overwhelming inner demand to be a preacher.

    I firmly believe that we possess an inner spirit to sense the presence of God in our lives. This is not to say that at any moment I am about to spout out some special revelation that no other possesses, but for me, I have peace about taking a certain direction in my life.

    Lord knows, there are also times when we find out that we have taken a wrong turn as well. One church thought for sure I was called to be their pastor, and so did I. Eight months later we were both parting company. We both agreed that we were wrong. It was a very miserable 8 months, and I even thought about leaving the ministry, and did for about 6 months. Situations changed and so did I. It was not because I could not do something else. I was still a licenced architect, but God had plans for me and my life and He made it clear by opportunity and open doors.

    Is this mysticism? Call it what you will. I call it the leading of the Holy Spirit and it comes from within the soul of man.

    Cheers, and God bless,

    Jim
     
  10. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jim,

    Let me try to clarify a few things. First, I'm not trying to attack the idea that God has a plan for our lives and that people and circumstances influence us to make wise decisions within that plan.

    Here are some of the things I'm concerned about:
    *A theology of God's will for us that is based on feelings, senses and experience rather than obedience, wisdom and Scripture.
    *Use of terminology that subjectively implies direct revelation with the result that people claim authority they do not possess.
    *The belief that everything will turn out just right as long as we make decisions "in God's will" and that if things go wrong we must have been "out of God's will."

    Thinking of your situation, your desire may have been to be an architect, but through the influence of a church you saw the opportunity to minister to them and chose to do so. You could have said no to their "call" perhaps with good reasons for your decision. You chose instead to go through that "open door," because you sensed an "overwhelming inner demand. Is that really any different from desiring the good work of an overseer as in 1 Tim. 3:1? Am I mischaracterizing your experience?

    I certainly don't intend to. I'm trying to let Scripture interpret experience rather than vice versa.
     
  11. Jim1999

    Jim1999 <img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,460
    Likes Received:
    1
    Siegfried:

    I think you are quite correct. The scriptures give us the basis for what we believe. It does not give me directions on how to get to Sheffield from London. For this, I must use a map.

    God has given us a mind, and we ought to use this mind to make certain determinations. If I wish to pass an examination, I best study, and study earnestly. This is common sense.

    Notwithstanding, and I believe this is scriptural, there is in our spirit a sense of the presence of God in our lives. I preach because I sense that calling to preach His word. It is also a command in scripture to do so.

    As to being a minister, certainly one's equipping is tantamount in making this decision. Yet, some have entered upon ministry without formal training, and been very effictive. One example is A.W. Tozer. We ought not to confuse this with "no training whatever". Tozer became a man of the book, and this was reflected in how he taught.

    There is the old saying, "Don't be so heavenly minded that you are of no earthly good." There is a balance in spirituality, and this includes our earthly passage.

    I think in what I said earlier, I was being quite rational about decisions, but not ignoring that sense of spiritual awareness in one's decisions.

    Cheers,

    Jim
     
  12. Ben W

    Ben W Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    6
    Siegfried, Fresh Revelation, might be something like "God has told me polygamy is o.k". A revelation that is in conflict with the Bibles teaching.

    A Revelation is also different to a Word of Prophecy. A Revelation relates to Doctrinal matters, wheras a Word of Prophecy relates to a physical matter.

    Various groups within Charasmatic churches like for example the Kansas city Prophets, supported by the Vineyard church are recorded as having made several false prophecies. Resultingly by scripture they are to be disregarded Jeramiah 23:16-22.

    There are modern day Prophets. David Wilkerson is an example. (interestingly he has removed his association with the AOG) It is documented that in 1987 He prophesied the stock market crash which happened in October that year. He also foretold the gulf war, four years prior to it happening. How can he do this? He is a student of the Word and the emphasis in his church in New York is always on the Word.

    A word of Knowledge - Strongs no 1108 gnosis, gno'-sis, means the act of knowing, relating to 1097 ginosko which has many applications in greek, one being to "percieve". There was a case of a pastor I knew who was at an airport and recieved a word, to get on a different plane to another destination than where he was going. Not knowing why, but knowing the voice of the Holy Spirit he went. Arriving at the airport, he made his way into the foyer. He then recieved a second word, this time to approach a chap seated in the waiting area, and witness to him. Which He did. As it happened the chap was led to Jesus Christ that very hour. Why God did not quicken somebody else who knows, But God moves in mysterious ways that is for sure.
     
  13. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ben W,

    You're clearly advocating a theology that is outside the parameters of historic Baptist doctrine. The fact that your illustrations of your approach are so recent historically is in itself a warning sign.

    Your thoughts are certainly worthy of debate, but since this the purpose of this thread is to examine modern novelties in light of historic evaluation of heresy, I'm not going to engage in a full scale debate in this thread.

    I will raise one issue. You speak of a pastor you know who seems to have received some "word of knowledge." God somehow "told him" to witness to someone. I've heard numerous stories of people who had similar experiences, followed the "word of knowledge" and destroyed their lives.

    Greg Boyd (the noted American open theist) relates one such story in one of his books in which a woman married a man after God had "plainly led her to do so," and he made wreck of her life. Boyd concludes that God must not have known what was going to happen. My guess is that God wasn't really telling her to marry the guy.

    You must realize that forming your theology on your or someone else's experience is building on a foundation of sand.
     
  14. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jim,

    You say,
    I would say, "You see the need and the command to believers to meet that need; therefore, you accept the responsibility to fulfill the Great Commission. Ultimately, you wanted to preach the Word."

    You say,
    I would say, "You were studying Scriptural teaching and meditating on how it applied to your life's situation. God granted you wisdom to help make right decisions as you submitted yourself to Scripture."

    No big difference between us. I just think it's dangerous to promote subjective language like "sense of spiritual awareness" and "inner spirit to sense the presence of God." You can explain what you're talking about biblically, but MANY others look for the inner feeling or the sign from heaven without and commitment to Scripture.
     
  15. Refreshed

    Refreshed Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    7
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I generally agree with Siegfried and Jim about someone saying "God told me to do this," but it does seem that scripture dictates we can count on direct guidance from God on all decisions we have to make, even down to our very steps.

    It would be a throwing out of the baby with the bathwater to not believe God through the Holy Spirit does not guide our steps, and I think that would be an unbiblical stand. As far as historic Baptists go regarding God's guidance, read the words to the hymn, "He Leadeth Me." It was written by J.H. Gilmore, who was a baptist preacher and professor.

    Here are some verses regarding God's guidance:

    Psalms:37:23: The steps of a good man are ordered by the LORD: and he delighteth in his way.

    Psalms:48:14: For this God is our God for ever and ever: he will be our guide even unto death.

    Proverb:3:4-5 again.

    Proverb:16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.

    Isa:30:21: And thine ears shall hear a word behind thee, saying, This is the way, walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand, and when ye turn to the left.

    I don't think God talks aloud to people as it is not warranted in scripture, but it would be disingenuine for me to disregard all the times in life, looking back, where God obviously had me by the hand and was leading me.

    I think of this especially when I preach, when sometimes I am able to sit back and listen to what I am saying, kind of detatched and an observer.

    I realize this example is subjective, but I believe a strong case could be made both historically and biblically for guidance of every step we make, if we will ask God for it.
     
  16. 2peter1_10

    2peter1_10 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Philippians 4:4-7
    Rejoice in the Lord alway: and again I say, Rejoice. 5Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand. 6Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God. 7And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.

    I guess this will be a little clearer. In a nut shall. The peace of God follows our prayers, which means it is they way God shows us His answers. But it is needful notice that prayer is preceded by praising God and living a godly life. God is not going to answer our prayers if we regard iniquity in our heart.

    There are many things that are reserved for the twelve disciples only, however, since the promise of the Holy Spirit applies to us, then the blessings of the Holy Spirit apply to us also. Although what He does through us is different then what He did through them.

    (Note: I may not be able to respond as quickly for the next few days. I will answer any questions that you have as soon as possible though.) [​IMG]
     
  17. Rev. G

    Rev. G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Siegfried, much of today's Evangelical culture is rife with Gnosticism. You may be interested to read a secular book on the issue - Harold Bloom's 'The American Religion.' There are a couple of chapters dealing specifically with the SBC.
     
  18. Daniel David

    Daniel David New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    5,316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Having peace because you always rejoice and bring supplication to God is not the same as saying you have a peace about something and therefore should follow through on your course of action. The latter is what Siegfried is talking about, I think.
     
  19. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm in a rush to get out of town, so I shall have to let Preach speak for me (because he is a personal hero and respect everything he has to say), I'll try to get online tomorrow.

    Thanks for the book, Rev. G.

    [ December 21, 2002, 09:39 AM: Message edited by: PreachtheWord ]
     
  20. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
Loading...