Gail Riplinger video

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by robycop3, Feb 5, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
  2. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
  4. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    ==No doubt about that. Her book "New Age Bible Versions" was a disaster.

    The google site said,

    " It objectively and methodically documents the hidden alliance between new versions and the New Age Movement's One World Religion."

    All I can say to that is HA!

    If I recall correctly her degrees are in home economics and not theology, history, or any related field. This shows in her works.
     
  5. EdSutton

    EdSutton
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is that a typo? :confused:

    Sure you did not mean to type DIS-information? For that is probably a more accurate description! :rolleyes:

    Ed
     
  6. Salamander

    Salamander
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    Did any of you really watch the entire video with an objectionable point of view or is this just the same old KJVO crowd again?

    My suspicions are probaly right.:tonofbricks:
     
    #6 Salamander, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2007
  7. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually you are wrong. I have watched the activities of one Gail Riplinger for several years. In fact there was a period, several years ago, where I looked into her arguments. I even found a copy of her book at the local public library (so I did not have to waste my money on it)! Her "scholarship" is sloppy, at best, and many of her claims just can't be supported. I can't recall the details, since it has been a while since I have given this any thought, but I know that her book "New Age Bible Versions" took several quotes out of context and misrepresented what some scholars said/beleive(d). I think her book belongs in the same grouping as Dan Corner's "The Believers Conditional Security". I would certainly hope that the KJVO position has better advocates than Riplinger. If not, well, it's time to fold up the old tent.
     
    #7 Martin, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2007
  8. Salamander

    Salamander
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2005
    Messages:
    3,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    So your answer is "No."

    You're only making rash judgements due to her stand on the KJB.

    Ever hear, "The proof is in the pudding"?

    If you're going to lump up Riplinger with heretics be advised, it makes you look rather foolish. No such thing as conditional security of the believer, you know that, and you aslo know Riplinger doesn't believe heresy like that either, if you really even do know her.
     
  9. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you expound on this apparent degree obsession? What does it mean if someone speaks on a topic that they are not degreed in? Does this make them unqualified, open to ridicule or what exactly is the issue? How does it show in her works?

    Personally, I couldn't care less whether someone goes through an antichrist state college, an antichrist Ivy league college or a seminary or any other institution that provides worldly criteria for acceptance. None are necessary to have a relationship and knowledge of God and none are necessary to expound on His word or type words into a computer to form a book.

    Having said that, this is an excerpt of her bio from her website:

    "G.A. Riplinger has B.A., M.A., and M.F.A. degrees and has done additional postgraduate study at Harvard and Cornell Universities. As a university professor, the author taught seventeen different courses, authored six college textbooks and was selected for the Honor Society's teaching award and membership in a national Education Honorary."​

    It would seem as though she's jumped through all of the educational hoops and excelled in her various roles. However, am I to understand, that in your view, a Christian with her educational background is not qualified to compare verses in multiple versions, research new age topics and compare them to these changes and then write a book about what she found? Is it your belief she would need to go back for additional skuling to be qualified to write a book on this topic? Is this truly a case of educational deficiencies or is it just a matter of what she found not aligning with your worldview and an attempt to seek any manner to discredit her?
     
  10. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    ==Did you read what I said? I am familiar with her work(s). I am familiar with her positions. I spent time looking into them. Nothing "rash" about this. Maybe you should reread my post???

    ==I did not lump her in with that group. Via her argumentation she lumped herself. Her work was misleading and, in my opinion, dangerous. That is not a rash judgment, it is a judgment based on my view of her work.

    ==I did not say that she believed in conditional security. I am putting the two books in the same category (sloppy). Again, maybe you need to reread my post???
     
  11. Bro Tony

    Bro Tony
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why is this woman teaching men? Doesn't the KJV speak against that?:thumbs:

    Bro Tony
     
  12. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    ==Does she "need" degrees in theology, Biblical studies, philosophy, or history to write books on those subjects? No. Does it add to the problems with her books when she claims she has degrees yet does not say the degrees are not in the field she is writing in? In my opinion the answer is YES.

    My step-father, now a retired professor, has three MA degrees (two in education and one in counseling) and a EdD degree. Is he qualified to write a book on dispensationalism? No. Could he write such a book? Sure, but he should make clear that dispensationalism is not his field of study.

    As far as her "findings" are concerned I don't think she "found" anything she did not already believe, one. And two there are massive problems with much of her argumentation.

    Again, if this is the best the KJVO camp has then it is time to close the store.
     
  13. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    If this is the best the Alexandrian camp has to discredit her book, then the store should remain open.
     
  14. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since I have not dealt with any of her arguments in these posts your reply makes no sense. Anyone who does their homework on her book (ie...checks sources, etc) is going to find some major problems. Don't believe me? Do your homework on her book.

    As for closing the store, that comment refered to her argumentation (not her degrees).
     
  15. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone know if Gail Riplinger can read Greek or Hebrew?


    Rufus_1611 mentioned he didn't care where her degrees came from, and to a point, I agree with him, however, for her to be qualified in my opinion, to speak and write about the Bible in a scholarly manner, she needs to be able to read Greek and Hebrew to understand the orginal texts.

    Jamie
     
    #15 JamieinNH, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2007
  16. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,219
    Likes Received:
    192
    Exactly!! I have her book but had never heard her speak--didn't know she gave lectures or whatever. I listened to the first few minutes and immediately thought, "This woman is trying to be a preacher." I am once again amazed and somewhat ashamed that there are many fellow IFBs that plug this woman and push her book.

    For crying out loud, there are good and scholarly books on the KJV and its underlying texts by men like Hills, Sturz, Wilbur Pickering. Why in the world do KJV advocates embarrass other IFBs like myself by pushing this woman preacher?
     
  17. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Martin: //Again, if this is the best the KJVO camp
    has then it is time to close the store.//

    Amen, Brother Martin -- Preach it! :thumbs:

    Care to share the $22 (plus $8 for
    shipping) I wasted on IN AWE
    OF THY WORD? She really gets wierd
    when she tells how 'J' as in 'Jesus' is sacred
    but 'I' as in 'self' is evil (we are talking letters
    here). But she didn't seem to know that
    in the original KJV1611 Edition that
    there is no 'J' and 'I', just 'I'.
    \o/ Praise Iesus! \o/

    Martin: //Anyone who does their homework
    on her book (ie...checks sources, etc) is going
    to find some major problems. Don't believe me?
    Do your homework on her book.//

    Been there - done that.
    Her scholarship reminds me of screen doors
    on submarines.
     
    #17 Ed Edwards, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2007
  18. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    I watched the entire video. Her foundation is the KJV translation. It is not an attempt to prove or disprove the KJV. She started with the premise that the KJV is right. What she did was to attempt to prove the others wrong without any proof that her fondation had any substance. Her idea is much like saying the sky is green and proving it by showing that the grass is green.
     
  19. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just started watching the video, and within the first 3 minutes, she quotes a scripture out of context... Actually it was 2 minutes 58 seconds, when she applys Psalms 12:6 and 7 to scripture, when in fact, when read in context it is talking about God's people...

    I am going to watch more, but so far false doctrine has raised it's scaley head within the first 3 minutes.
     
    #19 tinytim, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2007
  20. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    False teaching alert at 3 minutes and 40 seconds... she states that the reason the plagues were in Revelation is because people added to the word of God... funny, I thought it was because they weren't saved...

    Talking about adding to the Word, she is guilty of this here.
     
    #20 tinytim, Feb 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...