Gary North : The Political System is Rigged

Discussion in 'Politics' started by christianyouth, Apr 27, 2008.

  1. christianyouth

    christianyouth
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    1
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Older readers will recognize Senator Snort. For decades in the cartoon strip, Grin and Bear It, he was the universal archetype of a United States Senator. He frequently appeared on Faze the Nation. [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]There has not been a libertarian U.S. Senator in my lifetime. Robert A. Taft was closer to the position than the others, but he buckled on Federally funded public housing. He was the best we had, but he was not ideologically consistent. [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]There was no one in second place. [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]There have been two libertarian Congressmen: Howard Buffett of Nebraska and Ron Paul of Texas. Only one of them has attained national prominence, and that because of a run for the Presidency. Without warning, individuals used the Web to raise tens of millions of dollars for his campaign. He did not foresee this when he announced his candidacy. Neither did anyone else. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]He has collected a large database of people who sent money. This database can be used for political education. I hope this will be education on local political mobilization. Any office higher than mayor or state representative is a waste of time. It had better be a small-town mayor.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]THE SENATE [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Senate is carefully guarded by the Establishment. No libertarian has gotten elected in my memory. [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]A Senate race requires huge amounts of money. Only the two parties can supply this. A multimillionaire might be able to buy his way into a nomination if he was willing to do what New Jersey's Jon Corzine did. But libertarians with this much money are suspicious of politics. They are not about to spend their money on a Don Quixote effort. Besides, even if elected, what would they get? Committee assignments. They would preside over the care and feeding of the beast. [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]

    A quarter of a century ago, I sat down with Paul Weyrich. I asked him about what it takes to get conservatives – not libertarians – to run for office. He was forthright. "They will not run for a local office. I can get lots of people to run for the Senate, if I agree to raise the money. But they refuse to put in years in the trenches. They are not interested in lower offices."

    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]I wrote my piece, "The Dogcatcher Strategy," in response to his statement. It sat in my files unused for almost twenty years. A much-shortened version of it was published on LewRockwell.com in 2000.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Senate is a vetted organization. The party's hierarchy screens the candidates. Then the media screen the two rivals. If one of them deviates from the acceptable limits of discourse, the media come down on the side of the candidate who accepts today's Federal government. No one gets through the party's vetting who is hostile to the state.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This has been known by libertarians for decades. Leonard E. Read of the Foundation for Economic Education used to say of high-level politicians, "I do not drink tea with such people." Read never drank tea, but you get the idea. Another aphorism on campaign rhetoric: "The higher you fly to get the office, the farther you'll fall when you get it." He dismissed all but Howard Buffett and Ron Paul with this phrase: "They leak."


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Local politics is regarded as meaningless to the parties except in cities. This is why principled people can occasionally get elected. But they get outvoted in the bodies to which they get elected. They rarely are re-elected. They will face challengers from their own party at the next election. The challengers will have access to deep pockets in the Good Old Boy network.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This extends all the way up the chain of command. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Ron Paul faces this tactic this year. He has not had a challenger inside the Republican Party for years. He always defeats the Democrat. This year, there is a challenger for the Party's nomination. Paul has had to pull back from the national campaign until the Texas primary on March 4. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This is not random. The same phenomenon forced Kucinich out of the Presidential race last August: a challenger inside the Democrat Party.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]DON QUIXOTE RIDES AGAIN! [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The two parties screen candidates. They apply the rule articulated by House Speaker Sam Rayburn: "You've got to go along to get along." Those elected local politicians who do not go along do not get along with the hierarchy, which controls the money.

    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]We occasionally see someone with no political experience and no understanding of politics make a run for the Senate or other high office. I remember one back in 1966: William Penn Patrick. He ran for Governor of California against Reagan. I voted for him. I thought Reagan was just too liberal. In the Republican primary, Patrick got 1% of the vote, which anyone could get if he just got his name on the ballot. Patrick was a millionaire who had made his money with a multilevel marketing operation that sold cosmetics. He spent his own money. Nobody with an ounce of sense ever sent his campaign any money. It was a pure Don Quixote operation. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Nobody wants to be Sancho Panza at his own expense.


    [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Neophytes get interested in politics, play around, spend some time, and may even write a check. But a neophyte who actually thinks he can do anything except waste his time and money running for high office is totally misguided. He is without political understanding. Anyone who would try this without great personal wealth to waste on a Don Quixote campaign is wasting his time. Nobody will send him any money. People smart enough to have much money are not ready to waste it on someone else's soon-to-crash dream. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]

    CONCLUSION

    [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Politics is for our entertainment value. The system is rigged. It is not open to outsiders. The higher the office, the less it is open to outsiders. The more power the office seems to offer, the more guarded it is. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][​IMG]What can one person do? Develop a digital mailing list for sending out educational materials on the importance of self-government. "You mean he cannot effect political change at the national level?" That is exactly what I mean. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Senator Snort is not a libertarian. Ever.
    [/FONT]


    http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north605.html
     
  2. christianyouth

    christianyouth
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    1
    What you think?
     
  3. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agree 100%. Nothing is going to change without a shooting revolution.
     
  4. christianyouth

    christianyouth
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is why It's hard to get caught up in the Republican vs Democrat debates. :(
     
  5. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Cool! Another person who can see past the false left vs right paradigm. :thumbs:
     

Share This Page

Loading...