1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Geographical Calvinism

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by All about Grace, Apr 21, 2006.

  1. All about Grace

    All about Grace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    By the way, the Doctrines of Grace only speak to the "how" of salvation, not the "why". So your original question really doesn't deal with the 5-points anyways, which I tried to show early on that this is an issue for both C and A and everyone inbetween. </font>[/QUOTE]In my opinion you can't separate the how from the why ... the Bible doesn't. And the original question does deal with the foundational premise of Calvinism which suggests God elected certain persons to salvation ... it just seems ironic that most of those people happen to live in the same countries and families - another issue in and of itself (genetic Calvinism).
     
  2. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    By the way, the Doctrines of Grace only speak to the "how" of salvation, not the "why". So your original question really doesn't deal with the 5-points anyways, which I tried to show early on that this is an issue for both C and A and everyone inbetween. </font>[/QUOTE]In my opinion you can't separate the how from the why ... the Bible doesn't. And the original question does deal with the foundational premise of Calvinism which suggests God elected certain persons to salvation ... it just seems ironic that most of those people happen to live in the same countries and families - another issue in and of itself (genetic Calvinism). </font>[/QUOTE]I see the "why" of salvation in Eph. 1:11 -

    In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will

    We do not know the counsel of His will in all matters.
     
  3. All about Grace

    All about Grace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    So the gist of your answer is ... maybe the infants that are dying in those places are elect?

    The "stacked deck" comment was intended to be sarcastic (as indicated by the graemlin), but nevertheless the heart of the question remains the same regardless of time period. Whether it is 1006 or 2006 the challenge remains: why are there more "elect" within certain people groups while some people groups have no knowledge of Jesus Christ?

    Your answer indicates a geographical and chronological election process whereas certain people of certain places and at certain times are elected. And at the end all these people come together around the throne. So God's election becomes geographically centered and chronologically fulfilled.
     
  4. All about Grace

    All about Grace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    And in John 3.16, Rom 3:25-26, Rom 5:8, and in multitudes of other texts that point to both God's redemptive purpose and the offer of life to all people.

    Then why do we try and restrict his salvific purposes and plan to a five-point system?
     
  5. russell55

    russell55 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe all are, maybe some are, maybe none are. How would I know? And unless I know, the question is nonsensical.

    My answer is that over the whole of human history this has not been, nor will it prove to be, the case.

    No, you missed the point of my answer. God elects people before the foundation of the world, without regards to their place or time. He then places those elect people into times and places in which they will hear the gospel and believe. Time and place, then, are tools he uses to work out his plan for their salvation. Election results in specific time and place rather than specific time and place resulting in election.

    The two things--election and time/place--correlate, but you are assuming the relationship to be exactly the opposite of what a Calvinist would. Election is the cause of time/place rather than time/place being the cause of election.
     
  6. All about Grace

    All about Grace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not suggesting time/place result in election. What I am challenging is the "balance" (for lack of a better term) of an election that seems to be restricted to a certain people group while other people groups live and perish (during the same era) with what appears to be little or no elect.
     
  7. 4His_glory

    4His_glory New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why does election have to be balanced? Why did God reveal Himself to Isreal and for hundreds of years ignore other nations?

    God doesn't have to be "balanced", He is perfect so whatever He does is never unbalanced.
     
  8. russell55

    russell55 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    And I'm saying that election isn't restricted to certain people groups, but is rather the choice of certain people, and those people are placed in places and times where they will hear the gospel.

    And why are you choosing the arbitary criteria of "the same era" to decide whether election is balanced or not? Why does that make more sense than considering all of human history together? Wouldn't it make more sense to consider all of history as one, since that would be the vantage point God has?

    BTW, I don't think God is "balanced", if by that, you mean that he treats all people everywhere exactly equally. And I don't know where, from scripture, you get that idea. God never makes that claim for himself. He makes the claim that he is always be just, but not that he treats everyone exactly equally.

    As I've said before, the question is nonsense because its based on silly assumptions, arbitrary criteria.

    So, if you think it's so important for God to be balanced, why don't you object that he doesn't cause all people throughout the ages and in every place to have equal opportunity to hear the gospel?
     
  9. JackRUS

    JackRUS New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,043
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yawn. Straw man. Next it will be robots. Then "Calvin is a murderer." Can't you folks think of anything new? </font>[/QUOTE]I frankly have been wondering if Calvinists can think of anything but Calvinism. [​IMG] :rolleyes:
     
  10. Jarthur001

    Jarthur001 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,701
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yawn. Straw man. Next it will be robots. Then "Calvin is a murderer." Can't you folks think of anything new? </font>[/QUOTE]I frankly have been wondering if Calvinists can think of anything but Calvinism. [​IMG] :rolleyes: </font>[/QUOTE]I am a Calvinist, and right now, i'm thinking of food. [​IMG]
     
  11. All about Grace

    All about Grace New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Election is based on the choice of certain people placed at the right time and place?

    It makes more sense if you happen to be one of the right people at the right place at the right time.

    That's not what I mean by "balanced" so the rest of your point is moot.

    I've come to notice that these type of questions are only nonsense and silly to those who are on the inside of the club. It would not be as arbitrary and silly if one of your children was not the right person at the right time and place. But then again, I have never heard a die-harder admit that there is a good possibility their own children are not a part of the club. But that is another discussion -- perhaps we could entitle that thread "Genetic Calvinism".
     
  12. doulous

    doulous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it?
     
  13. doulous

    doulous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    So you reject limited atonement and unconditional election? </font>[/QUOTE]All, how does the belief that election is not limited to certain geographical areas negate limited atonement and unconditional election?
     
  14. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is my answer to your question:

    1. I don't know.
    2. I don't need to know.
    3. God's ways are above my ways.
    4. I have no right to judge God and his righteousness or fairness.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  15. doulous

    doulous New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is my answer to your question:

    1. I don't know.
    2. I don't need to know.
    3. God's ways are above my ways.
    4. I have no right to judge God and his righteousness or fairness.

    Joseph Botwinick
    </font>[/QUOTE]Joe, I appreciate your response but Calvinist's get beat up on that all the time. Whenever they say, "I don't know" as their final answer they get accused of the ostrich position (sticking their heads in the sand). I am not advocating fabrication of a position. Not at t'all. Sometimes they have to look at the premise behind the question. The premise may be fallacious, or it may truly be desirous of the truth. This is where wisdom and walking by the Spirit come into play.
     
  16. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    doulous,

    I appreciate your concern. I am not, however, worried about what a bunch of carnal Arminians think about me.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  17. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doulous,

    I do like your blog though. I wish I knew how you did that phoneblogz thing. That was really neat.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  18. Timtoolman

    Timtoolman New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    0
    So everyone thats not a calvinist is carnal, or just the ones on here?

    Or more like someone who shows this type of spirit towards others that is carnal! Yeah, thats the ticket! [​IMG]

    Your something else Jospeh. :rolleyes:
     
  19. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
  20. Timtoolman

    Timtoolman New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have learned that you are not much of a reasonable man Joseph. And that the teachings of calvinism is your all and all but I do not insult you by calling you carnal or anything else. Its called respect.

    :cool: [​IMG]
     
Loading...