Global warming 'fabricated' by nasa and noaa

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Aug 1, 2014.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    Scientists at two of the world’s leading climate centres - NASA and NOAA - have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate the extent of the 20th century "global warming".
    The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show "climate change" before and after the adjustments.
    When the raw data is used, there is little if any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models - 20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.
    This is especially noticeable on the US temperature records. Before 2000, it was generally accepted - even by climate activists like NASA's James Hansen - that the hottest decade in the US was the 1930s.
    As Hansen himself said in a 1989 report:
    In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/06/23/Global-warming-Fabricated-by-NASA-and-NOAA
     
  2. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. prophet

    prophet
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    2
    I remember that an Ice Age was gonna doom us all, back in the 70's.

    This year it came.

    It's cold up here.
     
  4. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    Yeah, they were talking about nuclear winter back then and in the 80s they all of a sudden started talking about rising sea levels and global warming.

    In Indiana, we are the target of the war on coal. Indiana Gov. Mike Pence went to Southern Indiana recently to visit the Bear Run mine near the Hoosier town of Dugger. The Bear Run mine is the largest surface mine east of the Mississippi River and employes 500 people.

    The war on coal would make a ghost town of Dugger, Indiana, as coal mining is the only occupation there since 1879.

    Several other mining towns in southern Indiana would become ghost towns based on this phony science from the lying American federal government.
     
  5. General Mung Beans

    General Mung Beans
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    0
    Regardless of Global Warming, coal is a nasty energy source that causes hundreds if not thousands of deaths from mine accidents and "black lungs" that should be replaced with nuclear and natural gas in the short-term.
     
  6. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    Your link is totally dishonest. I do not have time now to post proof, but will do so later today. You need to do some research on what Hensen really says. There is a 17 minute video of him explaining why global warming is a real and a coming disaster.



     
  7. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
  8. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    ROFL, oh what a wonderful laugh.

    The "alarmist" is the scientist that is supposedly quoted in the OP. Look him up. He is solidly saying that we are in the midst of global warming and that if we do not change disaster is ahead. The writer of the blog was and I suppose continues to be very dishonest.

    The trend, regardless of the 1930's, is upward and that spells big trouble ahead. In fact, it has already started. Before too many years even those who willing stay blind now will have to admit they were wrong.

    Also note the quote from Henson is from 1989. That was 25 years ago. Just in case you do not realize that, 25 years is a quarter of a century. Temperatures have climbed since then. To quote a 25 year old quote in attempting to prove something happening now is rather stupid.

    Also from that same report is the statement that you and others ignored.

    Also the US temperature is not the entire world:


    [​IMG]

    And this chart is at least 14 years out of date. In those 14 years the temperature has continued to climb worldwide.

    Also ignored in the OP and the article cited is the following predictions:

     
    #8 Crabtownboy, Aug 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2014
  9. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    All the huffing and puffing aside, the quote in the O/P is an exact replication of his words. You have shown no dishonesty.
     
  10. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    You are right, that is what is said in the article.

    However it does not prove anything as I showed in my reply. Old data does not apply to what is happening now. Right?

    Global warming is real. Agree?

     
  11. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    You said it was dishonest. Retract that, and we can continue.
     
  12. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    It wasn't dishonest as I did not notice it was from that article. I did make a mistake, no getting around that. What I found was that it was there, but that it is of no importance as it is old data. Also, it was restricted to North America. During that time world temperatures climbed and have continued to climb.

    Do you agree that world temperatures have moved upward?

     
  13. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    It was not a mistake. You said somebody needed to research what was actually said, when the exact words were put up there.
     
    #13 Bro. Curtis, Aug 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2014
  14. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    To answer your question, some parts appear to have temps that have risen, some appear to have cooled. Some oceans are warmer, some are cooler. Some glaciers are retreating, some astound scientists with their growth. Some places are being flooded. Some have drought. We had the coldest winter on record, up here. I hear those folks in the North east kinda had it rough, as well.

    But your movement is nothing more than a socialist scam to redistribute wealth, based on manipulated data, as the O/P shows, is verifiable, with links to the actual research involved. You addressed none of it, you simply called it dishonest and told everyone to watch a 17 minute video. That's not going to prove any point.
     
  15. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    More….

    Due to an error in calculations of mean U.S. temperatures, 1934, not 1998 as previously reported, is the hottest year on record in the United States. NASA scientists contend that the error has little effect on overall U.S. temperature trends and no effect on global mean temperatures, with 2005 still the hottest year worldwide by far, followed by 1998. The data corrections have added new fuel to the climate change debate, however — and could spell more public relations woes for NASA…..

    http://www.geotimes.org/aug07/article.html?id=WebExtra081607_2.html
     
  16. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    One year does not make a trend. In the scheme of the ages one year means nothing. July 1936 was the hottest July on record. So, what, that means nothing about what is happening now. There are always anomalies, but we are in a definite trend.

    Do a little searching on your own and you will find that 2005 and 2010 are tied as the two hottest years on record eclipsing 1934.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/post-carbon/2010/12/2010_hottest_climate_year_on_r.html

    Note that 13 of the 14 hottest years on record are in this century.

     
  17. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4


    It means you don't know what you are talking about. Why should I trust this, when it is constantly being manipulated, as the O/P proves, with links, and actual research.

    So what. ?

    That'd be a good trick, because at the time your link was written, the century was 9. Care to correct that ? Not to mention the article does not mention 1936, so it is factually incorrect.
     
    #17 Bro. Curtis, Aug 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2014
  18. JamesL

    JamesL
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    76
    I see about three interesting pieces in this snippet:

    1) warmest decade on record....when were records first kept? Late 1800s, or about 125 years ago?

    How old is the earth? Anywhere from 6,000 to 200,000,000,000 years old (depending on who you ask). Seems like an awful small amount of data to draw such dramatic conclusions of doomsday.


    2) 2013 temp was a whole 1 degree warmer than it was 25 to 55 years ago.

    3) 2013 was a whole 1/20th of a degree warmer than the average over the last decade.


    Where I am (in K.C.) the temperature swings 110 degrees from winter to summer. Winter lows down to -5 consistently, and summer highs up to 105 consistently. It's hard to get excited over 1 degree
     
  19. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    Most dishonest of you, selecting the wrong link. The report was released in Geneva, Switzerland on 24 March 2014. I will accept that you simply made a mistake. I double checked and the link I gave below is in my post.

    Do you agree that the world is becoming warmer?

    http://www.weather.com/news/science...ars-record-occurred-21st-century-wmo-20140324


    A report released in 2010 shows:

     
    #19 Crabtownboy, Aug 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2014
  20. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,126
    Likes Received:
    221
    so that means that 2006-2009 we were experiencing global cooling?
     

Share This Page

Loading...