Goverment by the budget

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Salty, Feb 23, 2010.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218
    Suppose the Government decided to set up different funds for operations:

    For example here are 7 general areas

    Gen govt operations ( congress, ect)
    Education
    Foreign Aid
    Homeland Security
    Military
    National Parks (incl historical sites)
    Social Service (welfare, ect)

    and the amount of tax deducted from your pay check would be sub-divided and indicated on you pay voucher?

    Further, the Government could not borrow from one line item to fund another. So, if Social service was running low on money, folk would only get a partial check.

    Thoughts?

    Salty
     
  2. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would this system work if applied to your local church and denominational budgets?
     
  3. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218
    Our church has a written budget and we go by it.
     
  4. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same for the churches we've been a part of, and if it runs out it's done. Makes for good management because you know what happens if you run out of money.
     
  5. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218
    Back to the OP and the answer is:
     
  6. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Big Sis Wants Behavior Scanners At Sports Events, Malls

    The idea has some merit but may be too complicated to put into practice.
     
  7. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218
    I disagree - its too simple :applause: :smilewinkgrin: to put into practice
     
  8. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    I favor the plan. Of your very limited choices I'll chose 100% national parks.
     
  9. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Seems a bit confusing, though if a citizen wants they could just check the budget and divide.
     
    #9 preachinjesus, Nov 26, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 26, 2010
  10. SRBooe

    SRBooe
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    First off, I assume you are speaking of the Federal Government. That being the case, then your list is too long. Since there are things on the list that are NOT the responsibility of the Federal Government, it should be more like:

    Gen govt operations ( congress, ect)
    Military (including border security)
    National Parks and lands (incl historical sites)
    Social Security
    Federal Transporation Systems (DOT)

    Things like foreign aid - if needed - should be run through congress each time it is considered. Our Federal Government should never had any hand in welfare or social security - but that cat is out of the bag. So many of us have been paying into it now for so long that it is too big an issue to just die away.

    Can you imagine putting the federal government on a budget? They'd have apoplexy!
     

Share This Page

Loading...