1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Grassy Knoll or Lone Gunman?

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by Dr. Bob, Nov 18, 2003.

  1. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is amazing that MORE US Presidents have not been the target of assassins. Even the Pope was not exempt.

    And yes, no one would do this and trust just ONE man. There would be back-ups and contingincies . . AND a way to kill the patsy that was set up for the killing.
     
  2. LarryN

    LarryN New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    958
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of 43 Presidents:

    4 have been assassinated: Lincoln (1865), Garfield (1881), McKinley (1901), and Kennedy (1963).

    At least 3 others have had serious attempts made on their lives: Truman, Ford, and Reagan.

    Reagan is the only one of five to survive being shot.
     
  3. Dina

    Dina New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2002
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    Court Tv is doing a story on it right now. they are also supposed to be showing new tests as evidence.
     
  4. swaimj

    swaimj <img src=/swaimj.gif>

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2000
    Messages:
    3,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    I saw the program on Court TV. They did a very good job with scientific tecniques to show that the conspiracy theories just don't hold up. Here are the most significant arguments, in my mind, that the show made.

    First, using the Zapruder film, they showed that the "single bullet theory" is quite plausible when you consider the positions the president and governor actually held when the bullets struck. No magic bullet required.

    Second, the evidence for the fourth shot from the grassy knoll is non-existent. The tape recording from the open mic on the police motorcycle is shown to have been made minutes AFTER the assassination, not during it. There are no gunshot sounds on the tape at all.

    Third, if there was a gunman on the grassy knoll, he left behind absolutely NO scientific evidence of his existence. Even the scientist who argued for him in the 1978 congressional re-opening of the investigation concluded that his bullet missed. The program showed that the final fatal shot which struck Kennedy (the one that threw his head backward) COULD NOT have come from the grassy knoll because a bullet from that location would have gone from one side of Kennedy to the other, not from front to back.

    Somehow I suspect the wild theories and speculations will continue. :rolleyes:
     
  5. Dina

    Dina New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2002
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    I watched it too. But I still can not wrap my brain around a lone gunman. If anything, all that watching it did for me was just create more questions.
     
  6. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe in more than one gunman, but not sure as to the consipiracies. It's not like JFK didn't have his enemies, so this could've been just a vanilla assasination attempt and the investigation bungled by the Feds (Gee, imagine that). But the climate politically and economically certainly adds fuel to the conspiritorial fire.
     
  7. Clay Knick

    Clay Knick New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Perhaps more than one gunman. I'm not
    sure about a plot. We'll never know.

    Clay
     
  8. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    I, too, saw it, and was very impressed with the evidence presented. A good deal of it was nothing new, it was just presented more completely. After watching it, I had changed my mind about the stretcher bullet. After seeing the info about the tumbling effect, and seeing ballistics results on tumbled bullets, I no longer think the bullet was planted. Rather, it is very possible, and given the radioactivity tests, probable, that the stretcher bullet was the bullet that did damage to Kennedy's back/neck and Connelly's back/neck/wrist.
     
  9. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have come to the conclusion that John F Kennedy was killed by the same people who killed JonBenet Ramsey and Nicole Brown Simpson.
     
  10. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
  11. td

    td New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2000
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lone gunman. The car was only 80 yards away and Oswald's rifle had a scope. The record shows he was an expert marksman and could consistently hit targets farther than 200 yds. Computer simulations rendered over the Zapruder film show it couldn't have happened any other way.
     
  12. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I tend toward the love gunman theory. The only niggly thought in the back of my mind is soemthing I remember hearing years ago and heard the tape on Irish radio again this morning. It is the tape of the on the scene radio announcer who, before he knew what was goin on, talked about the people and the police rushing up, as he called it, "a small hill" on Elm Street. All he kept saying was that "something has happened in the motorcade." This one aspect has always left doubts in my mind about the love gunman.
     
  13. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Best of Kennedy Assassination Websites

    A book I read about ten years ago was very enlightening. It's called Best Evidence [CLICK HERE] .

    The author was a graduate student earning his master's in physics when the assassination occurred. He thought at the time the best evidence was the Zapruder film, but he learned early on through his partnership with a law school professor the best evidence would be the testimony of those who handled the body.

    Over 700 pages, the author interviews both the Dallas doctors and the doctors from Bethesda, compares and contrasts their testimonies. His conclusion? Conspiracy.

    To those who think the Jennings subterfuge on ABC was anything but smoke and mirrors, I've got some oceanfront property in Kansas City for sale... :eek:
     
  14. Baptist Believer

    Baptist Believer Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,728
    Likes Received:
    783
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Except for the fact that it requires the bullet (allegedly shot from a 6th story window) to hit Kennedy between the shoulder blades, travel up the interior of his body, exit through his neck, go through the knot in his tie, go through Connelly’s back, wrist and thigh (leaving shrapnel lodged in his body) and then look like a bullet fired into cotton. Besides the trajectory problems, where did Connelly’s shrapnel come from? The so-called magic bullet had not lost any mass.

    Furthermore, it’s pretty clear that JFK was hit first and Connelly at least a second or two later (you can recognize the impact on Connelly when his cheeks “puff” from the impact of a bullet tearing through his body).

    And if the pristine “magic bullet” was not the bullet that went through their bodies and left shrapnel in Connelly’s body (we don’t know about Kennedy’s body except that the shrapnel from the head shot was found at the top of the skull – indicating that the fatal shot came from a much lower angle than the six-floor), who planted it there. And how did they run it through Oswald’s gun before he was arrested?

    I have not taken a position on which shots came from where or exactly how many there were. But there’s all kinds of eyewitness testimony that affirms that there was shooting from behind the picket fence on the “grassy knoll”.

    In the films of the scene, police and regular citizens charged up the slope looking for the gunman. During the shooting, eyewitnesses standing on the “knoll” heard shots coming from behind them.

    Yes. Everyone knows this.

    Not if the bullet didn’t exit the skull (if it would have, Jackie Kennedy probably would not have survived). JFK was leaning forward and slightly to the left when the fatal bullet struck (I just reviewed the Zapruder film in slow motion) and Jackie Kennedy’s head was very close to his as she was trying to figure out why JFK was clutching his throat. When he was hit, the right side and right rear of his skull exploded leaving bullet fragments in the top of his skull. That seems to indicated that the shots came from a low angle. Because of the extensive damage, some suspect that two bullets hit at almost the same time front both the right front and right rear (which would explain why the motorcycle police officer behind the limo was covered in blood and brain matter as well as all the occupants of the limo and a piece of his skull landed on the trunk of the limo – actually visible in the Zapruder film – that Jackie crawled onto the back of the car and retrieved before the Secret Service agent pushed her back into the passenger compartment).

    Yep. Because the Warren Commission report ignores too much evidence that doesn’t support their theory.
     
  15. Jerry Shugart

    Jerry Shugart New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
    One bit of evidence is very revealing.He was supposedly shot in the back while the bullet was moving in a "downward" motion.

    However,the evidence demonstrates that he was hit at the knot of his necktie.I cannot understand how this is possible.

    If he was hit in the back and the bullet was traveling in a "downward" motion then it would be impossible for the bullet to exit at the knot in his necktie!

    It was LBJ who had everything to gain from Kennedy's death and it was LBJ who had the resources in Dallas to cover up the facts.
     
  16. Jerry Shugart

    Jerry Shugart New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
  17. Jude

    Jude <img src=/scott3.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not for those of weak-stomach:
    http://www.powow.com/reviews/zap.htm

    I've watched several hours of 'conspiracy-theories' shows on History Channel. My suspicions:
    1. Oswald was indeed a patsy, as he claimed.
    2. Someone else killed Officer Tippett
    3. There were FOUR shots, at least, and the fatal shot came from the Grassy Knoll
    4. LBJ, Hoover and other high officials were involved in the conspiracy

    My conclusion:
    We will never know the truth in this life.
     
Loading...