Featured Here Are The States Where Obamacare Subsidies Could Disappear

You're denying this ? You ain't saved if you are.

This board is in error letting you on it.

 

Christ "teaching" was believe on him or go to hell. Not even you can change this.

 

He did not imply that at all. If you are going to engage people you need to be honest.

Christ did not teach dependence on the state. In fact the state was not even in view in anything Christ said. To apply his teachings to government control is to take His words out of context, misapply them, and do violence to scripture.

 

You accuse us of ignoring them in ignorance. You have no idea what people do.

You better hope they aren't about how we treat each other. You've done more name calling and out and out lying on this board than anyone else.

Again with the blatant dishonesty. I didn't say anything like that. If you want to talk, be honest. Isn't that what Jesus wants ? How can you harp on the proper treatment of each other, yet be so obviously dishonest ? You got problems.

Try again, without the lies.

 

NO one has said that either. What he did say is that the primary teaching was that Christ is the only way. The way folks like your present the gospel is that the government to should control our lives so no one gets left out.

Quite frankly the lack of imagination and innovative thinking of the left leaves them with no options other than to depend on government. Such thinking is contrary to the founding of this country.

 

Then you should be more honest.

My rejection of your democrat party is not cause for you to accuse people of not treating each other in the manner that Christ wants. It's quite frankly, ridiculously simplistic thinking.

 

The purpose in how we treat each other is so that God would be glorified. That discounts the government as an option.

 

What question did I not answer ?

 

Also, I couldn't help but notice you took that "prove by scripture that's what he said" nonsense down. Almost let the cat out of the bag on that one, eh, C.T.Boy ?

 

The legal principle in the ACA that says states are currently in violation of the ACA.

How so?

Then why are you so upset that people who have an opposite opinion from yours are supporting the SC uphold the ACA as its written?

You supported the ACA; you were okay with "we have to pass it to see what's in it"; and now that you're seeing it, you don't like it?

 

What a bunch of theological nonsense on stilts. You are so religious left that you make the teachings of Julius Wellhausen seem orthodox. How 19th century!

 

This is weird. When this thread first started, it was 10 million people will be affected if the SC votes a certain way.

When I posted a response to CTB the other day, the number was reported in news sources as 8 million.

Reading about it today, it's now 7.5 million.

???

 

A lot of people got well in the last couple of days!!!

 

Considering that many of those forced into these Obamacare policies can't get medical care anyway because they can't afford the deductibles...

I would think that a lot newly insured in those States will be happy to see the subsidies go if it means the end of Obamacare.

Then they could go back to having health care instead of supposed health insurance.

Health insurance does not equal health care.

 

And of course crabby doesn't want to address that.

Good point. Long waits have already begun.