Heresy

Great Minds Think Alike.

 

I don't even consider ME worthy of consideration.

Having said that, some of your other threads have been on what I would consider to be on the fringe.

You seem to throw around the name heretic quite freely. True Biblical doctrine and your opinion are not the same.

 

Thanks for the anwser, and I guess I was wrong about the ignore function. Can you admit you are wrong in a DEBATE forum?


Bill

 

I agree that "heretic" should be used for the most egregious errors in theology--messing with "the basics."

Cutter & I disagree on another thread...but that doesn't make him a heretic.








Just wrong.

 

Ok, just read most of the ME thread.

I think it is aptly named.
They think it is all about "ME" not about the work of Christ.
"ME" Must do good works to avoid purgatory.
That is truly a heresy.
I think I shall abstain from those heretic posters as well.

 

Nope, it's against the rules.

Very funny about KS and ME being Kansas and Maine! :laugh:

 

Off the top of my head:

James_Newman
J. Jump
Lacey Evans
Hope of Glory
Rufus_1611
Accountable

(List edited/updated to make it easy for others to reference if they want to create their own ignore list.)

A bunch of new people with low post counts, too, like KSeeker, for example.

If I missed any of the more prolific advocates, let me know. I want my "ignore" list to be complete.
.

 

Accountable also.

 

Thanks!

.........

 

I think there was another new poster besides kseeker, but I can't remember the name. They keep crawling out of the woodwork faster than I can keep up with. :laugh:

 

OHM? Who is that?

 

JJump had 2 accounts up until a week or 2 ago. OHM was JJump.

 

Yeah, Bob! You're a heretic too! How dare you actually discuss Scriptures instead of cowtowing to a few select individuals! Don't you know they know more about Scriptures than God himself?

 

Yet your doctrine is so weak that you still find it necessary to lie.

Now, that's truly telling.

 

You missed it because npetreley is a liar. I'm beginning to think that he's incapable of telling the truth.

 

Neither did the Pharisees and Saduccees when Jesus and John came preaching the gospel of the Kingdom.

 

I believe the admonitions about about those false teachers who are "accursed" and are to be rejected are regarding those preaching a false gospel.

A completly different gospel.

Are these ones whom are being NAMED on this thread as being worthy of rejection teaching a false gospel, or just seeing some particulars of the faith differently then we do?

Are they teaching that Jesus Christ is NOT "the way, the truth and the life", and that no one can come to the Father but by Him?

Are they rejecting justification by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone?

Are they teaching that one can be saved through Buddah, Muhummed, Krishna, Islam, etc etc etc?

It seems to me that if their primary error is that some will be excluded from the Millenial period, but that they will still be saved, than its an issue where we should disagree, yet not break fellowship.

I'm not real knowledgable of this issue, just tidbits that I've picked up on this thread, so I'm not real comfortable with naming names and deciding they are to be figuratively "burned at the stake" for their "wickedness" of doctrine...if they are OK with the foundational things.

Do we want to be like those picking up the stones to hurl, or like Jesus who said "You who are without sin...?

Mike

 

It's called "The Joey Faust heresy."