Hillary’s Boko Haram Problem

Discussion in 'Politics' started by poncho, May 17, 2014.

  1. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Not a lick of difference beyond tie color nuance between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy

    Kurt Nimmo
    Infowars.com
    May 17, 2014

    The GOP is getting up to speed ahead of the 2016 dog and pony show. It has deployed America Rising, the super PAC launched by Mitt Romney operative Matt Rhoades, to take on Hillary Clinton, the only viable Democrat candidate. Tim Miller and Joe Pounder, two RNC media strategists, help Rhoades get the message out.

    “Last week the Daily Beast reported that Hillary Clinton’s State Department ignored pleas by the US Justice Department, FBI, CIA and numerous lawmakers to designate Boko Haram as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). Since then, Hillary has been silent, as questions mounted,” America Rising said earlier this week.

    Mitt Romney, now on par with Bob Dole and other sidelined former selectees, believes Americans “would like to hear” from Clinton on the Boko Haram.

    Most Americans, of course, could give a whit less about Boko Haram. Most are at best vaguely aware of the African terrorist group. Most are preoccupied with worries about losing their jobs as the elite Mitt represents blow out the underpinnings of the economy.

    Marco Rubio, the onetime golden boy of a refashioned tea party movement, says Obama and Clinton are flub ups and have weakened the esteemed foreign policy of the United States by ignoring the Boko Haram threat and by failing to officially classify it as a terrorist group. Rubio has his eye on the White House, so anything he says about his potential rival is news worth reporting, or so the establishment media would have us believe.

    < snip >

    The silly joke behind Rising America is that there’s not a lick of difference beyond tie color nuance between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy (or, for that matter, much of anything else). Boko Haram is not high on the list of priorities, 200 school girls not withstanding. The kidnapping and lurid media coverage play well for the Africa agenda – reasserting full spectrum dominance more than 70 years after the fall of colonial empire on the continent and, of primary importance, undercutting China’s move to control plentiful resources there. Meanwhile, Africom churns ahead behind the scenes and headlines.

    President Jeb or whomever the Republicans elevate to read the teleprompter will not deal substantially different on Africa. Boko Haram is a roadside attraction soon distant in the rearview mirror. Come November, 2016, it will be almost completely forgotten.

    Read More At: http://www.infowars.com/hillarys-boko-haram-problem/
     
    #1 poncho, May 17, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 17, 2014
  2. Jkdbuck76

    Jkdbuck76
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    64
    Hillary will be protected by the media, unlike last time when she went up against Mr. Obama. My contention is that Mr. Obama could rip fetal puppies out of a dog and eat them raw on live tv and the liberal media would cover for him and MSNBC would say he had a good reason to do so. The same will hold true for Hillary when she runs for her 3rd term as President. They won't hold her accountable for anything. And people like my own Mom, whom I love dearly, will vote for her ONLY because they want to see the first female President in their lifetime. The political system is sick. I hope the Repubs aren't dumb enough to put Jeb up there.
     
  3. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    The political system is theater for the most part. The old media is hanging by a thread MSNBC is losing all it's viewers The NY Times is complaining that the new media is putting them to shame.

    Hillary even admits "they" are losing the the information war.

    Hillary Clinton: US Losing Information War to Alternative Media.

    The elite are complaining that a "global political awakening" is taking place.

    Published on Sep 3, 2012

    Zbigniew Brzezinski giving the CFR branch in Montreal a presentation discussing world government and his fears of the mass global awakening that has taken place.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgvGOfQheiU

    WE know who's behind it. We know who they are. We know their plans not because of some secret inside info that nobody has but because they tell us what their plans are everyday. We know how they game the system to steal our wealth manipulate the politicians that serve them.

    But none of it's true because so and so says it's all a conspiracy theory.

    Anyway I wouldn't count on the next CEO of the United States Inc being any different than the Bush Clinton dynasty. But just for kicks let's have a two year long debate about which puppet we'll have to support.

    Hillary vs Jeb? :laugh:

    It would be nice to think our public servants will be held accountable for committing crimes or other injustices but they won't be. It's all for show they're all "too big to prosecute" and they all belong to the same global organization.

    To bad "there's nothing we can do about it", besides bashing each other for being on the other team, or not belonging to either team at all and voting for another globalist.
     
    #3 poncho, May 17, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 17, 2014

Share This Page

Loading...