I dont want this to be percieved as an insult or an attack, I simply want a few people to see that what they are intending to do, which is defend the KJV, may not be happening. So I pose this question to those who frequent BB, but dont normally post in regard to bible versions. BE HONEST, what does the fact that some KJVO refuse to answer directly very simple questions make you feel about the validity of their position? Now, I am NOT ASKING FOR YOUR POSITION ON KJVO. I dont even want you to express it, per se. I want to know what others feel about these tactics, and if it makes you CONSIDER KJVO, or does it make you REJECT KJVO? I will make my purpose known here: I wish to understand how those OUTSIDE of the debate view the arguments of those INSIDE the debate. So, if you feel I and others are incorrect in saying they avoid questions, then let it be known. Both sides are under the miscroscope here, and I am not asking about "being nice" or things like that, I am merely talking about the AVOIDANCE OF QUESTIONS, AND THE CLAIM OF AVOIDANCE OF QUESTIONS. However you feel about the WAY QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED OR NOT ANSWERED, let them be heard. I am going to hold my tongue in this thread for a while, and I ask others like Roby, Cassidy, William, SFiC, Ransom, Keith, and all the others who post here alot to hang out for a while, and see what they have to say. Lets wait to respond for a day or 2, and see what we get. My goal is that we get enough responses that it is clear what the average christian who DOESNT study this stuff feels about it. Thoughts?