How is it that...

when an obvious "tongue-in-cheek" statement as follows is made:

Plain ol' Ralph
Member
Member # 9205

posted September 17, 2004 05:23 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just thought for the BIG debaters, this would incite the usual "riot"

But how and how are they NOT inline with each other?

I know one is non-fiction, the others? Well....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 59 | From: Ga | Registered: Aug 2004 | IP: Logged |

C4K


Member # 7160

posted September 17, 2004 05:31 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no debate that there are differences between the KJ translation and the other translations. For that matter, there are differences within the KJV itself it is various editions.

Since this thread started with an admitted attempt to "incite the usual 'riot'" it is in violation of this rule:

3. Do not start a thread with an attack or a flame as your premise. This is in violation of BB rules.

it is closed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The bias of a moderator can be so subjective to negate the use of this forum's intended purpose, and that should never have been the sole purpose of "attacking the (so-called) "false" doctrine known as KJVO"

Since the KJB is the Centerpiece of ALL these discussions, the thread SHOULD have been allowed to stand, BUT....