I certainly don't intend to rehash old news ... but I can't help but think that as racist as Sterling's comments were against blacks .... Rev Jeremiah Wright was as prejudice against the Jews, or after his apology, the Zionists. So, if it's okay to heap coals of public disdain on the head of Sterling and to call for the removal of him as the owner of the Clippers [and I agree that he is reaping what he sowed], should there not also be a move to "Deflock" the good reverend, and ban him from, let's say, speaking to ANY group, ever again? After all, this man not only has it in for Zionists, he is not fond of America, saying that, and he was talking about the "Rich white folk: "The chickens have come home to roost!" Here is one of his rants against "Rich white people!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdJB-qkfUHc And here is exerts of his rants against whites! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy Please tell me, how this man differs from Sterling, who happens to be a " white man?" I am interested in your views, really! Because IMHO, this shows me that white folk can't say anything about black folk, while the black folk get a pass when their racism rears its ugly head! Oh sure, Wright got raked over the political coals, but he is still a reverend, and making millions speaking his vitriol all around the world! But is one not as guilty as the other? Just wondering?