Most of you should be aware of the Caner controversy discussed in other threads. For the sake of this thread, we will assume that all accusations against Caner are true. This is NOT to discuss whether they are true. This is to discuss how to handle this if it WERE true. Ok, here are the details: He claims to have been born in Turkey, he was really born in sweeden. He claims to have been a devout muslim, he was in fact very nominal at best. He claims to have come to the US as a teen but in fact came to Ohio as a small child. He claims to be an expert in islam but in fact knows about as much as the average person knows about Christianity who went to baptist sunday school as a kid but has not been to church since. He claims to have learned about the US from Dukes of Hazzard as a child in the early 70s even though the program did not air until several years later. He claims to be an apologist who has debated many leaders of other religions yet there is no evidence and it is proven that he has lied about all of those debates. He uses these lies to promote his carreer as a public speaker and eventually as the president of a theological seminary. He has embellished his resume further his own success. Now, assume all of that is true (regardless of what you think really has happened or what will come out in the end) What do you think should be done to a person like that?