How Were Kurt and Barbara Aland Viewed in Baptist Circles as Textual Critics?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by JesusFan, May 23, 2011.

  1. JesusFan

    JesusFan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Were they seen as being THE prominent ones of the past century?

    was curious, as was required to read one of their textiul books on NT texts, and seemed to be very expert in that discipline!
     
    #1 JesusFan, May 23, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 25, 2011
  2. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,219
    Likes Received:
    194
    Kurt would be in the top ten I'm sure. I don't know about Barbara. Their greatest accomplishment was their editing of the UBS Greek NT project, 2nd & 3rd & 4th editions. (Don't know if Barbara was on the 2nd ed. project, since mine is loaned out right now.)

    While I disagree with their canons of textual criticism and their Alexandrian preference (being a Byzantine advocate), the apparatus in the UBS NT is very helpful.
     
  3. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Forget the UBS... the Nestle-ALAND says it all. And the apparatus is much better than the UBS.

    In total, both Aland's (but primarily Kurt I would think) are the parents of modern reasoned eclecticism. You might say that they are to the late 20th to 21st century realm of textual criticism what Westcott and Hort was to the late 19th and 20th (albeit with a different textual philosophy).
     
  4. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,219
    Likes Received:
    194
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the UBS and Nestles identical since UBS 3?

    You're probably right about the Nestle's apparatus being better in the sense of more complete. But I find the UBS apparatus easier to read and understand. And UBS has based on it that great Textual Commentary by Metzger.
     
  5. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    The text is the same. But I was referring to the apparatus. It is much more complete in that it lists 10x's the variants. But the data is not as full as the UBS.

    But even then, I have found many places where they don't even list the Byz reading. Thus, SBL's new apparatus will be helpful.
     
  6. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Sure take them and their methodology, texts and apparatus to Erasmus or the Elzivors. I still use my 1555 Stephanus, but smile when I see some choices made that just defy any rational thinking!

    Of course I think the modern eclectic blend of texts is vastly more accurate/reflective of the pre-conflated scribal later texts of the Eastern Orthodox scribes.

    The Alands along with Metzgar are genuinely looked upon by me as great servants to the church in the day when we have cultic attacks on God's Word by the likes of the ruckman types.
     

Share This Page

Loading...