Recently there was a good debate on the Bible versions forum between Jason and Will on the innerancy of the KJV of the Bible. This thread is not meant to start a versions discussion. I debated or passed information back and forth with Will at one time. This is what I know about him: Will is very sincere.You are not going to change his mind.However I think what many do not get about Will is that he also thinks ( or at least this is the way I get it)that if your version works for you then good.He thinks there is enough gospel in other translations of the Bible for one to get saved and be discipled from. I think the way He might describe it is other versions which are honest faithful translations are the Word of God but the KJV is God's Word. Will correct me if my understanding is wrong. Jason on the other hand believes only the original manuscripts are the Actual Word of God but there are faithful translations his personal favorite seems to be the KJV or NKJV. I am a KJV preferred 1-3 somewhere in there.I read from the KJV Study Bible on a daily basis. I do my scripture memory from a KJV. I teach and preach from a KJV. I also read and study and recognize several other versions (my favorites being ESV and NASB)recognizing them as honest translations of God's Word and as faithful as the translators were abble to make them which is the same claim the translators of the KJV made as they recognized they were not perfect.I think many on this board fall somewhere near my belief in this regard. It is my belief that we are closer than the KJV crowd thinks we are. I think they don't understand that we are not attacking the KJV of the Bible. Further I think they have no idea how much many of us love the KJV of the Bible.Thier big sticking point is that we can accept other translations as the Word of God. Am I somewhere close to right here?