If you were born in the year 1550

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by Salty, Oct 27, 2009.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
  2. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
    I am surporised that not even one person has answered this OP. I supposed the question :BangHead: is way to hard.??
     
  3. Shortandy

    Shortandy
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think its a great question. I am curious how the KJV only crowd will respond.
     
  4. Refreshed

    Refreshed
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    901
    Likes Received:
    0
    Born where? Where I live now?
     
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,505
    Likes Received:
    40
    This would have been my choice.:tongue3:

    I would have had to deny the KJV as some sort of modern heresy!!:smilewinkgrin:

    Just trying to stay as close to the original as possible!!:thumbs:

    (Tongue-in-cheek post; just in case anybody gets their shorts/panties in a wad!)

    [Administrative note - we allow the word "heresy" in this post since it is in jest and not in reality attacking anything. Normally, the word "heresy" is not allowed in genteel conversation on the BB]
     
    #5 just-want-peace, Oct 29, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 7, 2010
  6. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
    What difference does that make - but to satisify you -
    Born in an English speaking country
     
  7. TomVols

    TomVols
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Geneva. At the age of 10, I'd be ready for the Bible :thumbsup:
     
  8. Thermodynamics

    Thermodynamics
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I had the means I would have a Great Bible, if not I would settle for a 1526 Tyndale New Testament.
     
  9. Logos1560

    Logos1560
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,127
    Likes Received:
    2
    In English, it would be the 1560 Geneva Bible.
     
  10. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,129
    Likes Received:
    221
    Thought I would bump this up, because in another thread, Harold said "THE ONLY REASON TO REPLACE THE KJV IS TO PROMOTE ANOTHER MAN'S WORK" (post 38) . So Harold, in 1550, which version would you have read?

    To the best of my knowledge it was a group of some 70 men who "re-wrote" what became know as the KJV in the 1600's. I did check out "History of the KJV"

    Salty

    ps, I once heard that Shakespear was on that committe. Does anyone have info to back up or refute that info?
     
    #10 Salty, Jan 6, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 6, 2010
  11. Johnv

    Johnv
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probably the Great Bible, but might have switched to the Geneva eventually.
     
  12. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, HORRORS(!), there were about SIX English versions at that time. I don't suppose any were printed for the purposes of making money, and it must have been confusing for a person using the BB to go visit a church that was GBO.:tongue3:
     
  13. JTornado1

    JTornado1
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Either the Coverdale Bible or the Geneva Bible. I like them both. :thumbs:
     
  14. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,075
    Likes Received:
    102
    The Vulgate, of course. What else is there?
     
  15. Thermodynamics

    Thermodynamics
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    0
  16. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    While I love the Geneva, I am enough of a purist that I would probably be for the Latin Vulgate.

    But watching over the shoulder of Stephens and his 1550 blending of Greek manuscripts into a cogent text. That shift to looking back to the original Greek was a milestone in church history imho.

    That is still the Greek text I use as a base, only emending it with later discoveries of more ancient and accurate manuscripts.
     

Share This Page

Loading...