This thread is a look at indefenseofthegospel blog to show they in fact supply legalism At the website you will find a list of "Recommended Sites". One would have to think that in defense of the gospel supports the words of the links, or they would not be recommended. One link I want you to look at..."John MacArthur and Dispensationalism". http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/dispen/jmacdis.htm In it you will find that this group is calling for MacArthur to separate based on eschatological doctrines. Is eschatological doctrines something to fight over? Is eschatological doctrines "the gospel"? Yes we can have a good little debate of it, but to go to extremes of the recommended link is error. The error is legalism. It seems to me that MacArthur is showing the higher ground where the GOSPEL is what matters more. Why would indefenseofthegospel blog recommended legalism?