In epic upset, GOP's Brown wins Mass. Senate race

Be that as it may - in this particular race the pro-life vote was a vote for Brown for as I said his election will hopefully derail the funding of abortions that is sure to accompany any government sponsored health care system.

On the other hand - a vote for Obama was a vote in support of increasing abortion which we saw within a few weeks of his election.

Facts are facts.

Deny it all you like - it changes the facts not a whit.

 

I'm not sure how "epic" this "upset" is. After all, either the Republican or Democrat was going to win. I'll be impressed when we start electing real leaders. At this point, I am not that excited. As far as we know, Brown is just another politician. Only time will tell.

 

I find this interesting, too. He is pro-abortion. But it seems the ends justifies the means is becoming more popular.

 

Is this your definition of "pro-abortion"?

Rep. Brown indicated he supports the following principles concerning abortion:
Abortions should always be legally available.
Abortions should be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape.
Abortions should be legal when the life of the woman is endangered.

http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Scott_Brown_Abortion.htm

Now this is not a pro-life position and I personally do not agree with abortion for any reason - ever.

However this is also not a "pro-abortion" stance either.

 

I consider this statement:

to be pro-abortion. Or you can call it pro-choice.

He does support abortion except late-term abortions.