Indefinite Dictatorial Power

Discussion in 'Politics' started by KenH, Dec 22, 2005.

  1. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,935
    Likes Received:
    296
    Your source starts with this sentence:

    "This past Thursday, the New York Times exposed the most significant violation of federal surveillance law in the post-Watergate era."

    Setting up his column with a lie doesn't lend credence to the rest of his opinion.
     
  3. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is arguably a correct statement. I understand that those who are apologists for whatever actions - legal or not - that President Bush takes will not agree with the column.

    Remember, I voted for George W. Bush twice so I am willing to cut him some slack but these acts of illegal surveillance are simply beyond the pale and in good conscience I cannot support these actions.
     
  4. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    They are not illegal acts...at least it has not been proven to be illegal yet.

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  5. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, it seems pretty clear that the special court was not used. Even the retroactive manner of using the court was not used.

    It reminds of that hideous provision in the (un)Patriot Act where the government can break into your house and not even tell you about it for 30 days, or not even tell you about it at all if it deems it fit not to tell you about it.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,935
    Likes Received:
    296
    No court has ever ruled that FISA strips the President of his constitutional or statutory powers.

    Until they do, no one can establish that his actions are illegal.

    BTW There is a statutory exception to FISA. Maybe we should get familiar with it.
     
  7. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    And I see nothing in the federal constitution that makes the president into a king or a dictator.

    Maybe a Democrat-controlled Congress come 2007 will put a constitutional leash on the power of the executive branch.
     
  8. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Why would they want to do that?
     
  9. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
  10. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,075
    Likes Received:
    4
    I am curious and have two honest questions to the usual cast of characters who support the Administration on every issue every time:

    What would it take for you to criticize this President? What transgression would cross the line, in your minds?

    Those are two honest questions. If you feel compelled to give a caustic answer of offer contumely, please feel free to ignore these questions.

    Regards,
    BiR
     
  11. NiteShift

    NiteShift
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would say that if the Bush-Haters, and there are many of them here, stopped pointing to every statement or event as evidence that Bush is either (choose one):
    A Nazi
    The Anti-Christ
    A Fake Christian
    A Liar
    A Dictator
    A Fascist

    then we who support him would not feel compelled to circle the wagons, and could honestly debate President Bush's policies and actions. I don't expect to see that anytime soon.
     
  12. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    A better question might be: When will Bush Haters stop posting the lies of the leftist democrats on this Forum?
     
  13. hillclimber

    hillclimber
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,075
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is just another example of the democrats tossing another accusation against the wall, hoping it'll stick. The Pres. is/was completely in the clear legally and they all know it. It is just business as usual.
     
  14. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,935
    Likes Received:
    296
    And I see nothing in the federal constitution that makes the president into a king or a dictator.

    </font>[/QUOTE]You're over reaching, Ken.

    A king would not have informed Congress and the head if the FISA court at all. A king would not have consulted attorneys to get an opinion on the legality of his actions.
     
  15. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,264
    Likes Received:
    4
    Excellent post.
     
  16. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    NiteShift forgot
    </font>
    • A Moron</font>
    • A Puppet</font>
    • An Incompetent Thief</font>
    • A Kitten-Eater & Puppy-Stomper</font>
    but perhaps it's not the Bush-haters who imply that, merely the Bush-despisers.

    When has anyone called Bush a Nazi? It's not A Dictator, but A Wannabe Dictator (he said his job would be easier then).
     
  17. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I don't think the man is a moron and puppet somehow doesn't fit either, a puppet is unable to give concent to being manipulated by the puppeteer. It's pretty apparent he is able to give his concent.

    Bush isn't a nazi. Fascist?


    SOURCE

    What was the question again? [​IMG]
     
  18. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,505
    Likes Received:
    40
    Well stated, but as you can tell from this board, they aren't interested in facts, just demonization.

    See what I mean? :rolleyes:
     
  19. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, but I see that you can't tell humorous exaggeration when you read it.

    Facts would be very nice if you would only use them instead of demonizing those who disagree with you. BIR ( [​IMG] ) asked politely and, I believe, seriously what if anything would the president have to do to lose your support. Most the replies were nothing but demonizing the Democrats, no facts at all, just silly assertions.
     
  20. NiteShift

    NiteShift
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent post.


    Thank you Bro Curtis. We all disagree with at least some of Pres Bush's policies or statements. But when the opposition gets so outrageous, well just gotta defend the old boy. [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Loading...