Inherited/Married Wealth vs Earned Wealth

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OldRegular, Aug 7, 2012.

  1. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Is inherited or married wealth more respectable than earned wealth? The leftist/democrats apparently think so. Their candidate in 2004, John Kerry, was wealthy. He inherited some and married more but democrats never mentioned his wealth. Of course they have believed in a ruling class for years, much like the noble/serf system in Czarist Russia!

    BOSTON — Rosemary Forbes Kerry left many things to her son John: a flinty New England resolve, a worldly view of politics, and a middle name that conjures up images of a childhood drenched in wealth.
    The Democratic presidential candidate grew up in a world of elite private schools and vacations on a French estate, something most Americans could only dream about. His parents, a U.S. diplomat and a homemaker, turned to a wealthy, childless great-aunt, Clara Winthrop, to help pay the bills.
    Before he married Teresa Heinz, the heir to the food empire, Kerry had little more than his annual Senate salary of $133,600 and a trust fund valued at $50,000 to $100,000. When his mother died in 2002, he inherited trusts with $300,000 to $1.5 million in assets — a pittance compared to his wife’s estimated $500 million.​

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4685276/ns/politics/t/john-kerry-cheap-aristocrat/#.UCFFxN2JGRg

    Contrast the treatment of the press and democrats of Kerry with their treatment of Romney who started a company and earned his wealth!
     
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,252
    Likes Received:
    619
    The Democrats did not mention Kerry's wealth in 2004. The Republicans are not mentioning Romney's wealth in 2012.

    What's your point?

    That Democrats favor a czarist/serf system? Statement was made with no supporting evidence.

    Really, let's drop the class envy stuff.
     
  3. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,505
    Likes Received:
    40
    Emphasis mine.

    Now you have got to be kidding - who is the "ENEMY" of wealth if not the Ds.
    Well not really an "enemy of wealth", just the enemy of ANYBODY BUT THEMSELVES having wealth.
     
  4. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    As I recall the Republicans did not mention Kerry's wealth in 2004.

    I would note that Republicans have mentioned Romney's wealth and how he obtained it: The primary campaign!

    Also I would note that I have mentioned Romney's wealth!:thumbs:
     
  5. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Very true!:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:
     
  6. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,252
    Likes Received:
    619
    The pathetic OP is only posted to be provocative and it's basically a troll post.

    "Democrats think that inherited wealth is more respectable than earned wealth because they didn't mention the source of John Kerry's wealth in 2004. Democrats believe in a ruling class."

    Oh and BTW, Mitt Romney got a good start towards being a millionaire by being the son of George Romney, a millionaire that once owned American Motors Corp.
     
  7. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
    Obviously the OP has provoked you. Also you need to get your facts straight. American Motors was owned by stockholders!
     

Share This Page

Loading...