Is 'Fast and Furious' the real reason for Holder's resignation?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by carpro, Oct 23, 2014.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2...ous-executive-privilege-claim-holders-wife-2/


    Obama Asserts Fast and Furious Executive Privilege Claim for Holder’s Wife

    OCTOBER 23, 2014


    Judicial Watch announced today that it received from the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) a “Vaughn index” detailing records about the Operation Fast and Furious scandal. The index was forced out of the Obama administration thanks to JW’s June 2012 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and subsequent September 2012 FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:12-cv-01510)). A federal court had ordered the production over the objections of the Obama Justice Department.

    The document details the Attorney General Holder’s personal involvement in managing the Justice Department’s strategy on media and Congressional investigations into the Fast and Furious scandal. Notably, the document discloses that emails between Attorney General Holder and his wife Sharon Malone – as well as his mother – are being withheld under an extraordinary claim of executive privilege as well as a dubious claim of deliberative process privilege under the Freedom of Information Act. The “First Lady of the Justice Department” is a physician and not a government employee.
     
  2. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    This is what a false flag event looks like when it backfires.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,278
    Likes Received:
    780
    Back into court it will go.
     
  4. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Something is wrong here. I've been agreeing with you too often.

    At any rate, it's the cover-up that gets ya. Nixon knows.:smilewinkgrin:

    Here's betting Obama knows, too.
     
  5. Jedi Knight

    Jedi Knight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    45
    Holder will be saying "Im not a crook".
    :laugh:
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    And we will know he is lying, just like Nixon.
     
  7. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,458
    Likes Received:
    136
    More than likely, and maybe Obama will be next?:type:
     
  8. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    10,988
    Likes Received:
    79
    I think that all of the scandals that Holder was involved with had a cumulative effect. They won't get the papers for fast and furious as long as a Democrat sits in the White House.
     
  9. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Problem Reaction Solution.

    Simply Put:

    Problem - Manipulate “customer” reaction by creating a perceived problem, perhaps by leaking stories to the press e.g.: Iraq WMD, Terrorist threat, Global Warming

    Reaction – Your “customer” obviously is concerned by this apparent turn of events and demands help and protection

    Solution – Eh Voila, you come up with the solution to save the day, the same “solution” that you would never have been able to sell before making the customer worried e.g.: 5 years of Iraq war; an endless war on a noun (terror); and people for the first time being willing to pay more taxes and cut back on their consumption to “save the world” all under a false pretext.

    The question is does the end ever justify the means?

    - See more at: http://openyoureyesnews.com/feature-articles/what-is-problem-reaction-solution/#sthash.GWwMYBCl.dpuf

    Obama and Holder tried to create a problem so they could take advantage of the public reaction to introduce a "solution" they already had pre-planned. Kill the second amendment!

    Problem Reaction Solution.

    It's a no brainer. It works the same for republican administrations as it does democratic administrations . . . maybe even better.
     
    #9 poncho, Oct 24, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 24, 2014

Share This Page

Loading...