Is glfredrick "clueless"?

Discussion in 'Forum for Polls' started by glfredrick, Mar 9, 2012.

?

IS glfredrick CLUELESS?

Poll closed May 8, 2012.
  1. Yes, glfredrick is CLUELESS

    33.3%
  2. No, glfredrick is not CLUELESS

    66.7%
  1. glfredrick

    glfredrick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    0
    In another thread (well, in several different threads) webdog has called me "clueless." I decided to start a poll.

    Note that this is not about whether or not you AGREE with me -- I admit that some will never AGREE with me -- but instead, AM I CLUELESS?

    Please be kind and treat each other like brothers and sisters in the Lord as you respond!
     
  2. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    nah, you're just a Calvinist that is blinded by your own theology.

    ;)

    :D

    (that's different from being clueless right?)

    (yes, my tongue is firmly in my cheek.)
     
  3. Thousand Hills

    Thousand Hills
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,488
    Likes Received:
    4
    Nope :thumbsup:
     
  4. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,693
    Likes Received:
    242
    Not clueless. There is a hint of noncal in the mix, but you are definitely not clueless. Your learning is evident.

    webdawg, on the otherhand . . .
     
  5. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Glf cannot even start a poll correctly. What is the context, glf? Football? Cricket? Chemistry? Understanding your opponent's position?

    If the shoe fits...

    Aaron must be wearing the other... :)
     
  6. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me help you put this in context. My statement was in response to...

    ...which is CLEARLY an open theist position (something neither I nor others who hold a view similar to mine hold to).

    NONE of us have a problem with the sovereignty of God. It is merely a pejorative that is thrown around by glf...or if he actually believes such nonsense, let it be known on record concerning THIS...he is quite clueless.

    The fact someone would even start such a juvenile thread and poll speaks volumes.
     
  7. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0

    I agree and in order for those who use it to be honest and credible it should come to an end. Their integrity is at stake here.
     
    #7 mandym, Mar 9, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 9, 2012
  8. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    ...but he will come back and say it is not, that it is the truth. This makes him clueless on this particular matter, and my point stands. I won't vote in the poll since it is not qualified, but I am on the record stating concerning THIS he is absolutely "clueless". As long as he keeps regurgitating such nonsense the label applies.
     
    #8 webdog, Mar 9, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 9, 2012
  9. glfredrick

    glfredrick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    0
    The OP on this post is whether or not I am clueless.

    Webdog made the claim. I'm just testing it. :laugh:
     
  10. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Everyone, other than me, is clueless. So, obviously I voted that he is clueless.
     
  11. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    I also put the comment in context, unlike you...but what else would I expect?
     
  12. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,410
    Likes Received:
    328
    And I thought Obama was the audacious one.
     
    #12 Rippon, Mar 9, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 9, 2012
  13. Benjamin

    Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,893
    Likes Received:
    112
    Glf, if you really want to know; sometimes I think you couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance. :smilewinkgrin:
     
  14. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Benjamin, is that a yes or no?

    Glfrederick also violated board rules by including a member's name in the subject of a thread, even if its his own. Chalk up another C to "board rules" :D
     
  15. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,132
    Likes Received:
    221
    Not sure, I will have to call up Obama (I have his private home phone#) and ask him.....
     
  16. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Sorry webdog, it's you that is clueless on this one.

    "Do not use another member's screen names in topic titles."
     
  17. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pure semantics. The point of the administrative rule is to not allow the name of members in threads...ask an admin, I did. They didn't envision people talking about themselves in the third person...so you are quite incorrect.
     
  18. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,659
    Likes Received:
    158

    Oh, oh .... I've been named in a bunch of threads. I was clueless it was a BB offense. Shame on all those folk who have named and acronymed me. :smilewinkgrin:
     
  19. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, said I couldn't vote...but when someone posts filthy, vulgarity on a Christian site (against board rules) in order to "win" a debate, I must vote now.
     
  20. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    What post was that?
     

Share This Page

Loading...