Is the Sermon on the Mount the "Gospel"?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by canadyjd, Aug 2, 2008.

  1. canadyjd

    canadyjd
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    On another thread, Lou Martuneac made the following post:
    I want to answer Lou Martuneac here, so as not to derail the other thread.

    Scripture specifically says in Matt. 4:23 "Jesus was going throughout all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom..."

    Jesus begins the Sermon on the Mount with the beatitudes.."Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven..."

    It is clear that the "gospel of the kingdom" referred to in 4:23 is expounded plainly a few verses later with the Sermon on the Mount when Jesus goes into great detail concerning kingdom disciples.

    So, the answer must be, Yes! The Sermon on the Mount is pure gospel, since scripture refers to it as such.

    peace to you:praying:
     
  2. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    223
    A big obstacle of Lou Martuneac's is that he's a Dispy. That teaching will shade his understanding of the Gospel until by some miracle his eyes are opened to see more clearly. He won't be convinced by argument, or any amount of Scripture you can produce.

    Thank God that He brought me up out of the miry pit of Dispensationalism.
     
  3. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why is there so much condescension on this Board for dispensationalism? Can't the non-dispensationalists avoid making comments like the one above? It does not sound like love.

    Aaron, I usually agree with your posts so I am sorry to see this one. :tear:
     
  4. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    223
    I'm afraid I have little patience for a doctrine that robs the SOTM of the Gospel.
     
  5. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Deleted because not enough characters were entered. What is SOTM?
     
  6. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    SOTM??

    Even if you have little patience for it, it seems you should still respect your brothers and sisters in Christ who hold such views.
     
  7. rdwhite

    rdwhite
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Messages:
    434
    Likes Received:
    0
    I find several gospels mentioned in my Bible, and they seem to differ in nature. So, I would say that the yes the sermon on the mount is a gospel. The everlasting gospel preached by the angel in Revelation is a different gospel than what Paul preached and different from the Lord's sermon on the mount. Somebody once told me, "things that are different are not the same".
     
  8. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now you have a real problem, because John MacArthur is also a dispy...you know, the one Lou "the dispy" is refuting?
     
  9. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sermon on the Mount.
     
  10. TCGreek

    TCGreek
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm a dispy who rejects the teaching that the Sermon on the Mount is only for the Kingdom. Nonesense, I say.
     
  11. JerryL

    JerryL
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, I say!!
     
  12. AresMan

    AresMan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto. There is a difference between moderate and reasonable dispensationalism and hyperdispensationalism.

    I am dispensationalist in that, I see a difference between national geographical Israel and the disparate church. There are OT laws that are very specific to geographic boundaries, national government, and blood relations that cannot be (and are not) applied to NT church believers. However, I am not going to go to the extreme and split God's dealings throughout time into a seven-piece pie where each slice has a completely different filling.
     
  13. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    Marcia:

    The answer to your question is: Intellectual elitism.


    LM
     
  14. Marcia

    Marcia
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    0

    Yeah, it's sad.
     
  15. swaimj

    swaimj
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/swaimj.gif>

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2000
    Messages:
    3,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    First, let me say that I am a dispensationalist.

    Second, I am also an intellectual snob.




    Just kidding on the second one.

    I find it hard to deny that the gospel is given in the SOTM. One may argue, "but it does not contain the death, burial, and resurrection which is the definition of the gospel". That is true, but when Jesus preached it, he had not yet died, been buried, or been resurrected. Are we to conclude that Jesus never preached the gospel because those events had not yet occured? How can it be that Jesus never preached the gospel? And since Jesus had not done the acts that make up the gospel, how, prior to the fulfillment of those acts was a person saved?

    Consider the section in Mat 5:2-12 known as the beatitudes. Consider the results of those who obey Jesus' teaching in these verses:

    "theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
    "They shall inherit the earth"
    "...those who hunger and thirst for righteousness shall be filled"
    "they shall receive mercy"
    "they shall see God"
    "They shall be called sons of God"
    "Theirs is the kingdom of heaven"
    "Your reward is great in heaven"

    If a person possesses the kingdom of heaven and is set to inherit the earth, if they are filled with righteousness and receive mercy, if they shall see God and are called the son of God, and if their reward is great in heaven, how can they not be a saved individual? And is not the instructions given to obtain those things the way of salvation?
     
  16. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0

    Double Ditto or I Ditto the Ditto....
     
  17. Lou Martuneac

    Lou Martuneac
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    0
    A fw thoughts:

    1) Jesus often spoke of His coming death and resurrection (in the Gospels) prior to the actual event.

    2) What we also need to keep in mind is that we are in a new dispensation. We have the completed cannon, and the Gospel as defined in the New Testament. The Gospel is no longer a mystery.

    In any event, the saving message, the message that shows the lost man how he can be born again, become a Christian is not fond in the SOTM.

    In every dispensation salvation has always been by faith.

    Faith is revealed in each of these Dispensations. Much of the complaint against dispensationalists is that there is a teaching among them that God saved men in different ways. THAT IS A LIE! NO SUCH TEACHING EXISTS AMONG DISPENSATIONALISTS! SALVATION HAS ALWAYS AND ONLY BEEN BY FAITH!
    LM
     
  18. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    223
    Did you find me defending JM?
     
  19. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,648
    Likes Received:
    223
    Dispensationalism, as I understand it, teaches that there are two distinct peoples of God, and, as has been expressed, more than one gospel, more than one kingdom, and is typically premillennial in its eschatology.

    Not to debate it in this thread, I have little patience for it in any form. Just like it hinders LM from seeing the one and only Gospel in the SOTM, it robs Christ of His glory, marginalizes the Gospel and the Atonement of Christ.
     
  20. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    27
    How does dispensationalism color the interpretations of Lou in regards to the non-lordship position? I am curious, not challenging. How does dispensationalism affect their understanding of the Gospel.

    btw, I agree brother. Dispensationalsim is false.
     

Share This Page

Loading...