1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Is there any historical evidence for the Baptist position on Baptism?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Wittenberger, Jul 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    You believe in the assumption of Enoch and Elijah. You believe God can sanctify an object like the ark of the covenant which held the presence of God. Why not a person who held the very presense of God with in her. Revelation speaks about saints interceding for us
     
  2. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which of the following has a scriptural basis, and which does not? (1) The assumption of Enoch and Elijah, (2) The assumption of Mary.
     
  3. Zenas

    Zenas Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    20
    In Revelation 12:1 she is in Heaven wearing a crown. She had to get there somehow. It sure looks like an assumption to me.
     
  4. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Revelation 12:1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:

    Revelation 12:2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.

    Revelation 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

    Revelation 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.

    Revelation 12:5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
    --There is no woman clothed with the sun and with a crown of twelve stars in heaven.
    Revelation is an apocalyptic book with many symbols written in symbolic language. It requires the interpretive skills of the reader to discern which parts are to be taken literally and which are not, just as in the parables of Jesus. The woman represents Mary, but Mary is figurative and not in heaven. The resurrection has not happened yet, and Mary doesn't look like that.

    Furthermore, in verse two Mary has already given birth to Christ. Obviously this is a history, though all the facts are not chronologically in order. It is written as a story.

    In verse three, there is no dragon in heaven. The dragon obviously represents Satan.

    In verse four, the story takes us back to an event that happened sometime in the garden of Eden but in heaven when Satan rebelled against God and took one third of the angels with him. Lucifer, that great angelic being fell.
    It also gives his purpose--to devour or defeat the Christ, as soon as he was born, referring to the slaughter of infants by Herod.

    In verse five the narrative returns to the birth of Christ. That is not happening in heaven. It has already happened. It immediately refers to his rule in the Millennial Kingdom, an event yet to come, a time when Christ will rule the world with a rod of iron. And then the last part of the verse refers to the ascension.
    There is no woman with a crown of 12 stars in heaven!
     
  5. Fred's Wife

    Fred's Wife Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Revelation 12:1 does NOT describe Mary. Revelation 12 describes Israel at the heart of God’s program and the devil’s hatred toward her.

    There is no scriptural proof of the assumption of Mary...nor is Mary Queen of Heaven. Although there is no Scripture describing her death, a more likely scenario would be that she died, was buried and her soul/spirit is present with the Lord. The last time Mary (mother of Jesus) is mentioned in Scripture is in Acts 1:14.
     
  6. Zenas

    Zenas Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    20
    Actually, DHK, that is a pretty good explanation and it contains some things I had not considered before. I won't take issue with any of it except the last paragraph. I am amillennial in my outlook so I won't buy into the part about Christ in the millennial kingdom. Also, this woman, wherever she is, is clearly exalted. She stands above the moon, she is clothed with the sun and she wears a crown. It would be difficult to portray a figure with more honor than this woman has in Revelation 12:1.
     
    #66 Zenas, Jul 24, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2012
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    that is the ole RCC interpreatation there!

    Most would see it being either isreal or the Church, NOT mary!
     
  8. Zenas

    Zenas Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    20
    Do you know if anyone has ever identified Mary's tomb or place of burial? If they had, don't you think it would be one of the most visited shrines in the world?
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    again, ONLY RCCwould see Mary being there! majority see it either isreal, my view, or the Church proper, Bride of Chrsit!
     
  10. Zenas

    Zenas Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    20
    How can it be the Church? The Church didn't give birth to Christ. Christ gave birth to the Church.
     
  11. Fred's Wife

    Fred's Wife Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anybody know where Moses is buried? There is a reason why God does not reveal such things to us. Worship of a burial place and making it a shrine, is idolatry!

    If people knew where Mary's burial place was, there would be millions of Roman Catholics making "pilgrimages" to her gravesite, making it a shrine, and worshipping her corpse (which is probably a heap of bones now). That would be just one more way to "venerate" and "worship" Mary. That is probably the reason why God has not revealed to anyone where she is buried..."veneration" and "worship" of a dead saint....which is idolatry.

    Since the Roman Catholic Church had to have some way to continue venerating and worshipping Mary, and since God did not reveal where her burial place is located, therefore the false doctrine of a "bodily" assumption (similar to the ascension of Jesus) had to be somehow "forced" into the RCC Tradition. There is no "bodily" assumption of any human into heaven found anywhere in Scriptures---except for the bodily ascension of Jesus Christ, 40 days after His resurrection in Acts 1:9, and Enoch (Genesis 5:18-24; Hebrews 11:5), and Elijah (2 Kings 2:9-13).
     
    #71 Fred's Wife, Jul 24, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2012
  12. Wittenberger

    Wittenberger New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent post, my friend. I was going to leave some of these quotes next, but I'm very happy that you did all the work for me!

    When our Baptist brothers and sisters read the quotes from the early Christians that you have quoted above, I hope that they will keep this in mind: Constantine did not legalize Christianity until 300 AD, and it didn't become the state religion until years later, so any quote from above that occurred before 400 AD represented our early Christian forefathers who had not yet come under any authority by a Pope or an emperor.

    If Baptists have statements from early Christians that support their belief that baptism is OUR act of public profession of faith, please share it with us.
     
  13. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Scriptures set the presedent.

    Which of the following has scriptural basis?

    (1) Saints at the time of Jesus were raised from the dead (2) You are raised from the dead?

    Does that mean because the scriptures didn't identify that specifically you will be raised from the dead that you won't be raised from the dead? Or are they the fore runners of us who will be raised from the dead? Scriptures are both regional and specific to salvation history. Scriptures don't comment on North America or South America why because there was no regional contact with either continent from the people of Judea. Does that mean scriptures doen't apply to them? Of course not.
     
  14. Thinkingstuff

    Thinkingstuff Active Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    9
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Yet both Moses and Elijah spoke with Jesus on the Mountain and he conversed with them and three apostles saw Moses and Elijah as well. So its clear you can converse with people who have left this world and are with God in Heaven. After all Jesus did it and no one credits him with necromancy.
     
  15. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    what is clear is that God clearly said that living people do NOT talk with, converse, deal with those who have died!

    God raised up Samual, God brought back Elijah/Moses, but that was God doing it, as he ALONE can do that!
     
  16. Fred's Wife

    Fred's Wife Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0
    Moses and Elijah did not appear "in person" on that mountain. When all was said and done, Jesus told the apostles (Peter, James, and John) who were with Him, "Tell the vision to no man..." (Matthew 17:9)

    The "vision" of the transfiguration was nothing more than a revealing of a future event.

    Also note that Jesus was not asking Moses and Elijah questions, nor does Scripture say that He was praying to them. The vision of the transfiguration can nowhere be compared to the idolatrous act of praying to Mary or any dead saint. The fact that the transfiguration was a vision is proof that Jesus was not "speaking to dead saints in heaven".

    Wow...you folks really have to stretchhhhhhhhhhh the Truth in order to "force" your tradition to fit Scripture.
     
  17. Wittenberger

    Wittenberger New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow! You guys are really going off topic! The question of THIS thread is:

    Is there any historical evidence for the Baptist position on Baptism, not proving that we should all be saying prayers to the Virgin Mother of God.

    Here are quotes from early Christians supporting the orthodox position on baptism. Some have already been mentioned above. We orthodox Christians are still waiting for similar quotes from early Christians who supported the Baptist position.

    Early Church witness from within the first two centuries of Christianity, showing continuity with apostolic teaching concerning the efficacy of God’s saving Word spoken purposefully and specifically during holy baptism. As the apostles taught in Scripture, so too their immediate successors taught:

    Didache: 9:5 “And let none eat or drink of your Eucharist but such as have been baptized into the name of the Lord, for of a truth the Lord hath said concerning this, Give not that which is holy unto dogs.” (circa 80-100)

    “He was born and baptized so that by His passion He could purify the water.” St Ignatius (c. 105)

    “There is no other repentance than that which takes place, when we descended into the water and received the remission of our former sins.” Hermas (circa 150)

    “Before a man bears the name of the Son of God, he is dead. But when he receives the seal, he lays aside his deadness and obtains life. The seal, then, is water. They descend into water dead, and they arise alive.” Hermas (circa 150)



    “This washing of repentance and knowledge of God has been ordained on account of the transgression of God’s people, as Isaiah cries. Accordingly, we have believed and testify that the very baptism which he announced is alone able to purify those who have repented. And this is the water of life. For what is the use of that baptism which cleanses only the flesh and body? Baptize the soul from wrath and from covetousness, from envy, and from hatred.” St Justin Martyr (circa 160)

    “We who have approached God through His Son have received, not carnal, but spiritual circumcision, which Enoch and those like him observed. And we have received it through baptism by God’s mercy, since we were sinners.” Justin Martyr (circa 160)

    “But there is no other way than this: to become acquainted with this Christ; to be washed in the fountain spoken of by Isaiah for the remission of sins.” St Justin Martyr (circa 160)

    “Christ has redeemed us by being crucified on the tree and by purifying us with water.” St Justin Martyr (circa 160)

    “The things proceeding from the waters were blessed by God, that this also could be a sign of men being destined to receive repentance and remission of sins, through the water and bath of regeneration- as many as come to the truth and are born again.” Theophilus (circa 180)

    “When we come to refute them [the Gnostics], we will show in its proper place that this class of men have been instigated by Satan to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God. Thus, they have renounced the whole faith. For the baptism instituted by the visible Jesus was for the remission of sins.” St Irenaeus (circa 180)

    “But there are some of them [Gnostics] who assert that it is unnecessary to bring persons to the water. Rather, they mix oil and water together, and they place its mixture on the heads of those who are to be initiated . . . This they maintain to be the redemption. Other heretics, however, reject all these practices, and maintain that the mystery of the unspeakable and invisible power should not be performed by visible and corruptible creatures . . . These claim that the knowledge of the unspeakable Greatness is itself prefect redemption.” St Irenaeus (circa 180)

    “Man, with respect to that formation which was after Adam, having fallen into transgression, needed the bath of regeneration. Therefore, the Lord said of [the blind man] after He had smeared his eyes with the clay, ‘Go to Siloam and wash.” By this means, He restored to him both confirmation and regeneration that takes place by means of the bath.” St Irenaeus (circa 180)

    “Scripture says, ‘And he dipped himself seven times in the Jordan.’ It was not for nothing that Naaman of old, when suffering from leprosy, was a symbol for us. For as we are lepers in sin, we are made clean from our old transgressions by means of the sacred water and the invocation of the Lord. We are spiritually regenerated as new-born babes, just as the Lord has declared: ‘Unless a man is born again through water and the Spirit, he will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.’” Irenaeus (circa 180)

    “Being baptized, we are illuminated. Illuminated, we become sons. This work is variously called grace, illumination, perfection, and washing. Washing, by which we cleanse away our sins. Grace, by which the penalties accruing to the transgressions are remitted. Illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly.” Clement of Alexandria (circa 195)




    “And he who has just been regenerated- as the name necessarily indicates- and has been enlightened, is immediately delivered from darkness, and instantly receives the light… Thus, also, we who are baptized, having wiped off the sins that obscure the light of the Divine Spirit, have the eyes of the spirit free, unimpeded, and full of light, by which alone we contemplate the Divine, the Holy Spirit flowing down to us from above.” Clement of Alexandria (circa 195)

    “John prophesied up until the baptism of salvation.” Clement of Alexandria (circa 195)

    “Happy is our sacrament of water, in that, by washing away sins of our early blindness, we are set free and admitted into eternal life . . . We, like little fishes, after the example of our Ichthus, Jesus Christ, are born in water.” Tertullian (circa 198)

    “Oh, miserable unbelief that denies to God His own properties, simplicity, and power! What then? Is it too wonderful that death should be washed away by washing?” Tertullian (circa 198)

    St Irenaeus (d. 202) remarks, “For He came to save all through means of Himself all, I say, who through Him are born again to God, infants, and children, and boys, and youths, and old men” (Against Heresies, Book 1, Ch. 22.4).

    In his commentary on Romans, Origin (d. 254) writes, “The Church has received from the apostles the custom of administering baptism even to infants. For those who have been entrusted with the secrets of divine mysteries, knew very well that all are tainted with the stain of original sin, which must be washed off by water and spirit” (Romans Commentary, 5.9).

    St Cyprian (d. 258) writes, “In respect of the case of infants, which you say ought not to be baptized within the second or third day after birth, and that the law of ancient circumcision should be regarded, so that you think that one who is just born should not be baptized and sanctified within the eighth day, we all thought very differently in our council. For in this course which you thought was to be taken, no one agreed; but we all rather judge that the mercy and grace of God is not to be refused to any one born of man . . . Spiritual circumcision ought not to be hindered by carnal circumcision . . . we ought to shrink from hindering an infant, who, being lately born, has not sinned, except in that, being born after the flesh according to Adam, he has contracted the contagion of the ancient death at its earliest birth, who approaches the more easily on this very account to the reception of the forgiveness of sins - that to him are remitted, not his own sins, but the sins of another” (Letter 58 to Fidus).

    And in his Enchiridion, St Augustine (d. 430) declares, “For from the infant newly born to the old man bent with age, as there is none shut out from baptism, so there is none who in baptism does not die to sin" (Enchiridion, ch. 43).
     
  18. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Catholics and Reformed Catholics (Lutherans, Presbyterians, etc.) flee to uninspired sources to substantiate their doctrine of infant baptism. However, I view the Apostate-Nicene Father's as the history of apostasy.

    This should be evident as the Post-Nicene Apostate Fathers is the logical consequence of the Nicene Apostate Father's and the Nicene Apostate Father's is the logical consequence of the Apostate Ante-Nicene Fathers.

    The New Testament predicts the future historical characteristics of both Apostolic Christianity and apostate Christianity. The Apostate Church Father's fit every apostate characteritic predicted in Scripture.
     
  19. Wittenberger

    Wittenberger New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    Once again, I must ask you: how do you know that your interpretation of the Bible is accurate other than trusting your own feelings of being right or thinking that the Holy Spirit has given you a special revelation telling you that you are right?
     
  20. Wittenberger

    Wittenberger New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    0
    So when do you believe that the early Church became apostate? What year? What evidence do you have?

    The reason that I am not interested in debating you over the doctrine of baptism is that I have done this already with the Southern Baptist Convention and it will just end in a stalemate: we have "our" verses and you have "yours".

    This thread asks for HISTORICAL evidence that supports the Baptist position on Baptism. If you aren't interested in doing that, maybe you should start your own thread and ask orthodox Christians to debate you on the subject.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...