Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in '2008 Archive' started by James_Newman, Dec 30, 2006.
That man looks like evil incarnate.
You've never take a bad photo, I suppose ...
This particular Pope has taken alot of bad photos. He is certainly not camera friendly...
It just reminded me of a documentary I saw the other day about child sexual abuse in the Catholic church. Apparently his holiness was responsible for enforcing the orders to cover up sexual offenses for about twenty years. Just the image of him leering at children sends shivers down my spine.
Isn't that the same guy that took Darth Vader as an apprentice?
The real question is, who is his master?
Here's the documentary...
It's not for the squeamish.
Pope Benedict XVI is definitely not as photogenic as Pope John Paul II. LOL!!!
some people do not take good pictures, they are satanic becasue of it. and i'm no pope fan, i am not defending him, only that this pictures in reality tells us nothing.
No offense to him, but I immediately thought "Cain" of the Poltergeist movies. He was the evil ghost Reverend.
I agree the pope is not as photogenic as the late JohnPaul 2. I really do not care as long as he is fearless in the Lord and has the courage to do the Lords work despite everything.:thumbsup:
Seem to remember something in scripture about God looking at what is in the heart, not on the outward appearance. Think we are in danger of making theladership of a church into something like a beauty contest? - I'm not a pope fan, but this is definately the wrong criterum to judge him on.
Some say Paul was not easy on the eyes...
Is covering up pedophilia the Lord's work?