1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jesus used a “version” of the Bible

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by stilllearning, Sep 30, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 7 of 7
  1. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    With only the information you have provided, I would say this: "The sky was blue with big puffy clouds."


    but really I have no idea and have no clue what you are talking about [/sarcasm]
     
    #121 jbh28, Oct 7, 2010
  2. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    OK, let's look at the Vaticanus. The foundation of the Critical Text is the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus.

    The Vaticanus was missing large portions of scripture.

    Dean Burgon wrote concerning the Vaticanus:

    So, the Vaticanus was also a horribly sloppy piece of work that showed obvious tampering.

    These are the foundational texts for the Critical Text.
     
    #122 Winman, Oct 7, 2010
  3. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    3
    My book says, "This sentence is not found in the oldest manuscripts."
     
    #123 Mexdeaf, Oct 7, 2010
  4. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Your posts is a sloppy piece of work. The Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus is not the foundation of the CT. Also, most manuscripts are not full bibles. In other words, all manuscripts have portions of scripture missing. We look at the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus for certain variants to see what their reading is
     
    #124 jbh28, Oct 7, 2010
  5. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    OR could it possibly be that "gasp" that's what they had to copy from????
     
    #125 annsni, Oct 7, 2010
  6. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    No, anything different from the KJV had to have a devilish motive to it. again [/sarcasm]
     
    #126 jbh28, Oct 7, 2010
  7. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Well, that's quite judgmental of you. Can't you just take it on faith? I hear the older posts removed that sentence but the newer posts were faithful to the originals and kept it. You KNOW that God preserved that sentence, right??
     
    #127 annsni, Oct 7, 2010
  8. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ok, you are trying to tell me that a text found in the VATICAN was lacking text sources? Is that your argument? :laugh:
     
    #128 Winman, Oct 7, 2010
  9. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    If someone found a KJV in the Vatican would that make it bad?
     
    #129 jbh28, Oct 7, 2010
  10. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Okay - that's enough
     
    #130 NaasPreacher (C4K), Oct 7, 2010
Page 7 of 7
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...