KJBOs place Alexandrian MSS on par with DaVinciCode Gnostic filth

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by Forever settled in heaven, May 14, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Forever settled in heaven

    Forever settled in heaven
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
    says a lot about how they regard God's Word:

    calvarypandan.org/weekly/

    here's a famous Alexandrian Manuscript (God's Word):

    [​IMG]

    and here's some heretical boks:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen Now there is Some Big proof TCassidy!
     
  3. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    proof of what? the OP states that the alexandrian manuscripts are God's word. What are you talking about?
     
  4. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,073
    Likes Received:
    101
    The OP says that the Alexandrian text(s) are corrupt and present a Jesus more to Brown's liking.

    Proof of nothing.

    Just another inflammatory thread.
     
  5. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    doesnt he say "Alexandrian manuscripts" then (God's Word)?

    Did I miss something?
     
  6. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    No, it's a repeat of some old guesswork and conjecture. Notice it includes the "Psalm 12:7 thingie" which immediately casts a cloud over the whole article. Using that "thingie" shows the authors didn't do any meaningful research, but simply copied some of the KJVO stuff of others, since Wilkinson placed the "thingie" in his book & subsequent KJVO authors copied it in lock-step. Also, the other stuff is quite non-original until they get to the "Da Vinci" parts.

    This article came from Singapore, and was brought to our attention by Joseph Ng("Amarillo" on Ezboard), who keeps tabs on Dr. Khoo & his associates.
     
  7. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who is the OP? And what authority do they have over Gods Word?
     
  8. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well where was proof when they got burned in the fire maybe the 17:8 question was there! And Tiscendorf Doctored up the text to appease all who would follow!Proof is not all Scintific! You have All proved that the KJB is Infallible and inerrant!
     
  9. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Proof!
     
  10. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,163
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    I agree. The mansucript Joseph posted a picture of is the word of God. Thank you for finally admiting that.
     
  11. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, William is more MV than Cassidy would EVER be.
     
  12. Keith M

    Keith M
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    More garbage from the KJVO camp. Even the textus receptus is not a single perfectly preserved Greek text. Isn't it true that the TR is made up of various pieces that were put together to form a larger picture, somewhat like a jigsaw puzzle? The TR is definitely not an examploe of something being perfectly preserved.

    This passage always gets the KJVO folks in trouble. They intentionally disregard the context which is talking about people, not words.

    Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the law.

    Now the KJVO camp is making the false claim that the KJV has been "continuously preserved by God down through the ages?" And here I thought the KJV didn't appear until 1611, which shows it is not the fulfillment of what the KJVO sect claims for Psalm 12:6-7. The KJVOs disprove their own fantastic claims, because they claim God promised to preserve His word forever, then claim that perfectly preserved word is only in the form of the KJV. The KJV, if it is the perfectly preserved word the KJVOs hold it up to be, means that God didn't preserve His word forever, but only from the 17th century going forward.

    It is truly sad that anyone falls prey to the myths and errors that form the KJVO belief!
     
  13. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    KJVO in English, " Many shall come in My name " is the reason for the Argument Not in everyother language! Is the point! The point the modernists make is that they had to stuggle with the Spirit to get this translation (KJV) But in fact the only struggle is the MV's are still trying to figure out The text which I just Quoted! Just a Tought!
     
  14. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    not
     
  15. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mods, when is that translator coming?
     
  16. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. The mansucript Joseph posted a picture of is the word of God. Thank you for finally admiting that. </font>[/QUOTE]you are welcome! but prove that the NASB is! Not contains; but is! just a tought!
     
  17. william s. correa

    william s. correa
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    well maybe we should give it so Tylenol? or just a Dose of some good old time religion! KJB#1
     
  18. Rev. Lowery

    Rev. Lowery
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    0
    Keith M just a few questions for you m8.

    What is the Word of God?

    How do you know what isn't the Word of God?

    If we dont have the Word of God then God is a liar?

    What was the Word before the 1500's what did those ppl read?

    From 50 - 100 AD what did they read ?
    100 - 200 ?
    200 - 300 ?
    300 - 400 ?
    400 - 500 ?
    and so on and so on

    I am sure this same debate went on then as it does now.

    I'll ask you again what is the Word of God, I mean the 100% Word of God?

    In what way is it preserved ?

    Who has it ?

    Where is it ?
     
  19. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    I agree. The mansucript Joseph posted a picture of is the word of God. Thank you for finally admiting that. </font>[/QUOTE]you are welcome! but prove that the NASB is! Not contains; but is! just a tought! </font>[/QUOTE]Okay - prove that the the KJV is, not contains: but is! Just a thought!
     
  20. Rev. Lowery

    Rev. Lowery
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    0
    KJV is an exact translation of the original texts from there original languages into English the NASB and other MV's are variations on the KJV.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...