KJO MOVEMENT

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by Salty, Apr 26, 2016.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,102
    Likes Received:
    218
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,204
    Likes Received:
    611
    It's not too bad, but it gives rebuttals of KJVO short shrift. It suffers, like almost all arguments against the Alexandrian texts, by calling them "corrupt" and then offering no reasoning behind the claim, except that these manuscripts were from Egypt. Again and again the Alexandrian texts are called "unreliable" or "corrupt" and no good examples of why they are corrupt are given.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. TCassidy

    TCassidy
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,163
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    Like most wikipedia articles it is all over the place. Many of the characteristics cited as being KJVO are not, but rather are scholarly opinions regarding the relative merits of the Byzantine and Alexandrian textforms and the representatives of the Byzantine textform, the Majority text, the Received text, The Robinson/Pierpont text, etc.
     

Share This Page

Loading...