Since all of you are so proud of running off the KJVO crowd; let's try another experiment to liven up the old Versions/Translations debate thread. I am going to take a KJV "preferred" position and see if you guys can beat me. I will do like a good attorney would do for his client and present the best case possible and let us see who can win. Unlike many of the strong KJVO, I think I can discern the difference between emotional please and factual argument. Let's start out. Since debate is much like a court case, I will not expose my entire hand until I play the cards as the debate continues, so don't make any assumptions when I ask a question and be careful how you answer because I will find discrepencies. Ready? I start off by saying that MOST new Bibles are Alexandrian based with the exception of the NKJV (which might actually be okay, we haven't determined that yet--for sake of argument) and a few such as the MKJV which I don't know anything about. The Bibles that I say have inferior source documents are the standard MVs such as NIV, HCSB, ESV, etc. Go for it. . .