KJVO DIVISIVE!

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by psr.2, Aug 23, 2004.

  1. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Thats right the KJV OPPOSERS are divisive!
    They cannot decide which version is best but they are agreed on one thing that the KJV is not.
    The will mask there true belief behind twisted words but there true feelings come through crystal clear.

    They will accept versions with verses removed, the name of God removed, the blood of Christ removed etc. before the God inspired KJV.
    It's obvious that the judgement is not made by comparing the scripture but by trusting some Greek and Hebrew so-called scholar.

    I for one find that pathetic and to quote Dr. Bob
    "GARBAGE."

    Don't kid yourself into thinking this post will last long because those with the power to erase and edit cannot take what they dish out.
     
  2. USN2Pulpit

    USN2Pulpit
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,641
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, while it's still open, I'll say that you have been evasive in the other thread - either unable or unwilling to support your comments - choosing instead to attack everyone with differing opinions.

    The simple question was this: "where was God's Word in 1610?" I believe God provided His Word for the people even prior to 1611, don't you?
     
  3. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    psr.2:Thats right the KJV OPPOSERS are divisive!
    They cannot decide which version is best but they are agreed on one thing that the KJV is not.


    The KJV...Good News for 17th century man!


    The will mask there true belief behind twisted words but there true feelings come through crystal clear.

    And our FACTS...something totally lacking from the KJVO camp. What we have from them are vacuous statements...statements that have NOTHING to back'em up.

    They will accept versions with verses removed, the name of God removed, the blood of Christ removed etc. before the God inspired KJV.

    Please cease your fanatical rattling long enuff...IF YOU CAN...to answer these simple questions...WHAT PROOF CAN YOU PROVIDE THAT THE KJV IS ISSPIRED TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER ENGLISH BVS?

    AND...

    CAN YOU PROVE THE BVS YOU RANT AGAINST HAVE ACTUALLY LEFT MATERIAL OUT...OR HAVE THEY NOT KEPT WHAT WAS ADDED TO THE KJV?


    It's obvious that the judgement is not made by comparing the scripture but by trusting some Greek and Hebrew so-called scholar.

    And where do you think the KJV or any other valid English BV came from? They didn't just magically appear.
     
  4. Ransom

    Ransom
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't feed the troll.
     
  5. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    There is a perfect example of a person shown the truth but cannot see it. The god of this world truly does blind the minds of the unbelieving.
    Don't waste my time asking for truth when you will not accept it. All you are interested in is saving the world from the KJB.
     
  6. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    I can feel the divisive spirit coming from your posts. EW!
     
  7. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    All of your "if" questions have a father. Check out the work of Satan in Matt.(hint that is in the N.T.) He always comes up with the "if" questions."If thou be the Son of God"
     
  8. Bro.Bill

    Bro.Bill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dear PSR.2,
    You may not realize it but you are talking to a lot of KJV preferred types here.We read,memorize and quote from the KJV.We love the KJV, teach,preach,and study from it. We just recognize there are other valid versions.People grow in thier Christian walk using these versions. People get saved using these versions.They have something to contribute.They are just asking that KJVO only tyoes recognize that.
     
  9. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    PSR2 is a troll and not interested in thoughtful discussion.

    You ARE the weakest link.
     
  10. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    [snipped]

    [ August 23, 2004, 01:05 PM: Message edited by: Dr. Bob ]
     
  11. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    No Dr. Bob I have personally asked you to discuss scripture and stop you nasty remarks and you refuse. That is weak.
     
  12. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    [snipped]

    [ August 23, 2004, 01:04 PM: Message edited by: Dr. Bob ]
     
  13. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Please start a thread on a Scripture verse that proves the AnglicanVersion is the ONLY English translation.

    Without a basis in Scripture, we can't have a "discussion of Scripture".

    I will wait.
     
  14. WallyGator

    WallyGator
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank You, Bro. Bill!
    Amen [​IMG]
     
  15. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Snip snip just like SOME folks do tht true word of GOD KJB.
    You cannot discuss content just bicker versions.
    Sad.
    You also cannot take what you dish out.Plain for all to see.
     
  16. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    psr.2, when are you actually going to talk about Bible versions in the Bible versions forum, instead of talking about other posters?
     
  17. Trotter

    Trotter
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,815
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, dude! Shut up a minute and look at something.

    No one here is opposed to the King James Version. What we are opposed to is the outright LIE of the man-made doctrine of King James Version Onlyism!

    Go ahead and delude yourself...you seem well versed in it.

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  18. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    False False False! I read the posts about how poorly the KJB trans. did. Don't kid me...DUDE?
     
  19. psr.2

    psr.2
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    There is no discussion on versions. The KJB is the one and only true bible containing the very words of God.
     
  20. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    psr.2 said "The KJB is the one and only true bible containing the very words of God."

    If it is the "one and only", then logic dictates that there wasn't one before 1611. This makes God a liar for 1600 years. This proves your premise false.
     

Share This Page

Loading...